Weyl connection

In differential geometry, a Weyl connection (also called a Weyl structure) is a generalization of the Levi-Civita connection that makes sense on a conformal manifold. They were introduced by Hermann Weyl (Weyl 1918) in an attempt to unify general relativity and electromagnetism. His approach, although it did not lead to a successful theory,[1] lead to further developments of the theory in conformal geometry, including a detailed study by Élie Cartan (Cartan 1943). They were also discussed in Eisenhart (1927).

Specifically, let M {\displaystyle M} be a smooth manifold, and [ g ] {\displaystyle [g]} a conformal class of (non-degenerate) metric tensors on M {\displaystyle M} , where h , g [ g ] {\displaystyle h,g\in [g]} iff h = e 2 γ g {\displaystyle h=e^{2\gamma }g} for some smooth function γ {\displaystyle \gamma } (see Weyl transformation). A Weyl connection is a torsion free affine connection on M {\displaystyle M} such that, for any g [ g ] {\displaystyle g\in [g]} , g = α g g {\displaystyle \nabla g=\alpha _{g}\otimes g} where α g {\displaystyle \alpha _{g}} is a one-form depending on g {\displaystyle g} .

If {\displaystyle \nabla } is a Weyl connection and h = e 2 γ g {\displaystyle h=e^{2\gamma }g} , then h = ( 2 d γ + α g ) h {\textstyle \nabla h=(2\,d\gamma +\alpha _{g})\otimes h} so the one-form transforms by α e 2 γ g = 2 d γ + α g . {\textstyle \alpha _{e^{2\gamma }g}=2\,d\gamma +\alpha _{g}.} Thus the notion of a Weyl connection is conformally invariant, and the change in one-form is mediated by a de Rham cocycle.

An example of a Weyl connection is the Levi-Civita connection for any metric in the conformal class [ g ] {\displaystyle [g]} , with α g = 0 {\displaystyle \alpha _{g}=0} . This is not the most general case, however, as any such Weyl connection has the property that the one-form α h {\displaystyle \alpha _{h}} is closed for all h {\displaystyle h} belonging to the conformal class. In general, the Ricci curvature of a Weyl connection is not symmetric. Its skew part is the dimension times the two-form d α g {\displaystyle d\alpha _{g}} , which is independent of g {\displaystyle g} in the conformal class, because the difference between two α g {\displaystyle \alpha _{g}} is a de Rham cocycle. Thus, by the Poincaré lemma, the Ricci curvature is symmetric if and only if the Weyl connection is locally the Levi-Civita connection of some element of the conformal class.[2]

Weyl's original hope was that the form α g {\displaystyle \alpha _{g}} could represent the vector potential of electromagnetism (a gauge dependent quantity), and d α g {\displaystyle d\alpha _{g}} the field strength (a gauge invariant quantity). This synthesis is unsuccessful in part because the gauge group is wrong: electromagnetism is associated with a U ( 1 ) {\displaystyle U(1)} gauge field, not an R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } gauge field.

Hall (1993) harvtxt error: no target: CITEREFHall1993 (help) showed that an affine connection is a Weyl connection if and only if its holonomy group is a subgroup of the conformal group. The possible holonomy algebras in Lorentzian signature were analyzed in Dikarev (2021).

A Weyl manifold is a manifold admitting a global Weyl connection. The global analysis of Weyl manifolds is actively being studied. For example, Mason & LeBrun (2008) harvtxt error: no target: CITEREFMasonLeBrun2008 (help) considered complete Weyl manifolds such that the Einstein vacuum equations hold, an Einstein–Weyl geometry, obtaining a complete characterization in three dimensions.

Weyl connections also have current applications in string theory and holography.[3][4]

Weyl connections have been generalized to the setting of parabolic geometries, of which conformal geometry is a special case, in Čap & Slovák (2003).

Citations

  1. ^ Bergmann 1975, Chapter XVI: Weyl's gauge-invariant geometry harvnb error: no target: CITEREFBergmann1975 (help)
  2. ^ Higa 1993
  3. ^ Ciambelli & Leigh (2020)
  4. ^ Jia & Karydas (2021)

References

  • Bergmann, Peter (1942), Introduction to the theory of relativity, Prentice-Hall.
  • Čap, Andreas; Slovák, Jan (2003), "Weyl structures for parabolic geometries", Mathematica Scandinavica, 93 (1): 53–90, arXiv:math/0001166, doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-14413, JSTOR 24492421.
  • Cartan, Élie (1943), "Sur une classe d'espaces de Weyl", Annales scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure, 60 (3): 1–16, doi:10.24033/asens.901.
  • Ciambelli, Luca; Leigh, Robert (2020), "Weyl connections and their role in holography", Physical Review D, 101 (8): 086020, arXiv:1905.04339, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.086020, S2CID 152282710
  • Dikarev, A (2021), "On holonomy of Weyl connections in Lorentzian signature", Differential Geometry and Its Applications, 76 (101759), arXiv:2005.08166, doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2021.101759, S2CID 218673884.
  • Eisenhart, Luther (1927), Non-Riemannian geometry, AMS.
  • Folland, Gerald (1970), "Weyl manifolds", Journal of Differential Geometry, 4 (2): 145–153, doi:10.4310/jdg/1214429379.
  • Hall, G. (1992), "Weyl manifolds and connections", Journal of Mathematical Physics, 33 (7): 2633, doi:10.1063/1.529582.
  • Higa, Tatsuo (1993), "Weyl manifolds and Einstein–Weyl manifolds", Commentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancti Pauli, 42 (2): 143–160.
  • Jia, W; Karydas, M (2021), "Obstruction tensors in Weyl geometry and holographic Weyl anomaly", Physical Review D, 104 (126031): 126031, arXiv:2109.14014, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.126031, S2CID 238215186
  • LeBrun, Claude; Mason, Lionel J. (2009), "The Einstein–Weyl equations, scattering maps, and holomorphic disks", Mathematical Research Letters, 16 (2): 291–301, arXiv:0806.3761, doi:10.4310/MRL.2009.v16.n2.a7.
  • Weyl, Hermann (1918), "Reine Infinitesimalgeometrie", Mathematische Zeitschrift, 2 (3–4): 384–411, doi:10.1007/BF01199420, S2CID 186232500.

Further reading

  • Matsuzoe, Hiroshi (2001), "Geometry of semi-Weyl manifolds and Weyl manifolds", Kyushu Journal of Mathematics, 55: 107–117, doi:10.2206/kyushujm.55.107.
  • Pedersen, H.; Tod, K. P. (1993), "Three dimensional Einstein–Weyl geometry", Advances in Mathematics, 97 (1): 74–109, doi:10.1006/aima.1993.1002.
  • Hirică, Iulia; Nicolescu, Liviu (2004), "On Weyl structures", Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 53 (3): 390–400, doi:10.1007/BF02875731, S2CID 123385518.
  • Jiménez, Jose; Koivisto, Tomi (2014), "Extended Gauss–Bonnet gravities in Weyl geometry", Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31 (13): 135002, arXiv:1402.1846, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/13/135002, S2CID 118424219.
  • Čap, Andreas; Mettler, Thomas (2023), "Geometric theory of Weyl structures", Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, 25 (7): 2250026, arXiv:1908.10325, doi:10.1142/S0219199722500262, S2CID 201646408.
  • Mettler, Thomas; Paternain, Gabriel (2020), "Convex projective surfaces with compatible Weyl connection are hyperbolic", Analysis & PDE, 13 (4): 1073–1097, arXiv:1804.04616, doi:10.2140/apde.2020.13.1073, S2CID 119657577.
  • Alexandrov, B; Ivanov, S (2003), "Weyl structures with positive Ricci tensor", Differential Geometry and Its Applications, 18 (3): 343–350, arXiv:math/9902033, doi:10.1016/S0926-2245(03)00010-X, S2CID 119624508.
  • Florin Belgun; Andrei Moroianu (2011), "Weyl-parallel forms, conformal products, and Einstein–Weyl manifolds", Asian Journal of Mathematics, 15 (4): 499–520, arXiv:0901.3647, doi:10.4310/AJM.2011.v15.n4.a1, S2CID 55210918.

See also

  • Weyl connection, Encyclopedia of Mathematics