United States v. National Treasury Employees Union

1995 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. National Treasury Employees Union
Argued November 8, 1994
Decided February 22, 1995
Full case nameUnited States, et al. v. National Treasury Employees Union, et al.
Citations513 U.S. 454 (more)
115 S. Ct. 1003; 130 L. Ed. 2d 964; 1995 U.S. LEXIS 1624
Holding
Section 501(b) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 violates the First Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityStevens, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Concur/dissentO'Connor
DissentRehnquist, joined by Scalia, Thomas

United States v. National Treasury Employees Union, 513 U.S. 454 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Section 501(b) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Background

Congress amended the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 with the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 (Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 101–194). In section 501(b), Congress prohibited its members, federal officers, and other government employees from "accepting an honorarium for making an appearance, speech, or writing an article."[1]

The National Treasury Employees Union challenged this section as an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment's freedom of speech protection.[1] The District Court held the honorarium ban unconstitutional and enjoined the government from enforcing it.[1] The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the District Court's holding.

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice John Paul Stevens authored the majority opinion. Citing the test put forward in Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, the Court found that the restriction put in place in Section 501(b) of the Act "constitutes a wholesale deterrent to a broad category of expression by a massive number of potential speakers" requiring an even greater burden than that put forward in Pickering.[2]

References

  1. ^ a b c "United States v. National Treasury Employees Union". Retrieved May 21, 2016.
  2. ^ "United States v. Treasury Employees". Retrieved May 21, 2016.
  • Text of United States v. National Treasury Employees Union, 513 U.S. 454 (1995) is available from: CourtListener  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Public displays
and ceremonies
Statutory religious
exemptions
Public funding
Religion in
public schools
Private religious speech
Internal church affairs
Taxpayer standing
Blue laws
Other
Exclusion of religion
from public benefits
Ministerial exception
Statutory religious exemptions
RFRA
RLUIPA
Unprotected
speech
Incitement
and sedition
Defamation and
false speech
Fighting words and
the heckler's veto
True threats
Obscenity
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny
Overbreadth
Vagueness
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
Content-based
restrictions
Content-neutral
restrictions
In the
public forum
Designated
public forum
Nonpublic
forum
Compelled speech
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
Compelled representation
Government grants
and subsidies
Government
as speaker
Loyalty oaths
School speech
Public employees
Hatch Act and
similar laws
Licensing and
restriction of speech
Commercial speech
Campaign finance
and political speech
Anonymous speech
State action
Official retaliation
Boycotts
Prisons
Prior restraints
and censorship
Privacy
Taxation and
privileges
Defamation
Broadcast media
Copyrighted materials
Incorporation
Protection from prosecution
and state restrictions
Organizations
Future Conduct
Solicitation
Membership restriction
Primaries and elections
Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e