J. Robert Oppenheimer

American theoretical physicist (1904–1967)

Known forSpouse
Katherine "Kitty" Puening
(m. 1940)
Children2RelativesFrank Oppenheimer (brother)Awards
  • Medal for Merit (1946)
  • Enrico Fermi Award (1963)
Scientific careerFieldsTheoretical physicsInstitutionsThesisZur Quantentheorie kontinuierlicher Spektren (1927)Doctoral advisorMax BornDoctoral students Signature

J. Robert Oppenheimer (born Julius Robert Oppenheimer; /ˈɒpənhmər/ OP-ən-hy-mər; April 22, 1904 – February 18, 1967) was an American theoretical physicist who served as the director of the Manhattan Project's Los Alamos Laboratory during World War II. He is often called the "father of the atomic bomb" for his role in overseeing the development of the first nuclear weapons.

Born in New York City, Oppenheimer obtained a degree in chemistry from Harvard University in 1925 and a doctorate in physics from the University of Göttingen in Germany in 1927, studying under Max Born. After research at other institutions, he joined the physics faculty at the University of California, Berkeley, where he was made a full professor in 1936. Oppenheimer made significant contributions to physics in the fields of quantum mechanics and nuclear physics, including the Born–Oppenheimer approximation for molecular wave functions; work on the theory of positrons, quantum electrodynamics, and quantum field theory; and the Oppenheimer–Phillips process in nuclear fusion. With his students, he also made major contributions to astrophysics, including the theory of cosmic ray showers, and the theory of neutron stars and black holes.

In 1942, Oppenheimer was recruited to work on the Manhattan Project, and in 1943 was appointed director of the project's Los Alamos Laboratory in New Mexico, tasked with developing the first nuclear weapons. His leadership and scientific expertise were instrumental in the project's success. On July 16, 1945, he was present at the first test of the atomic bomb, Trinity. In August 1945, the weapons were used against Japan in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to date the only use of nuclear weapons in an armed conflict.

In 1947, Oppenheimer was appointed director of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, and chairman of the General Advisory Committee of the new United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). He lobbied for international control of nuclear power to avert nuclear proliferation and a nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union, and opposed the development of the hydrogen bomb, partly on ethical grounds. During the second Red Scare, these stances, together with his past associations with the Communist Party USA, led to an AEC security hearing in 1954 and the revocation of his security clearance. He continued to lecture, write, and work in physics, and in 1963 was given the Enrico Fermi Award as a gesture of political rehabilitation. In 2022, the U.S. federal government vacated the 1954 revocation of his security clearance.

Early life

Childhood and education

Oppenheimer was born Julius Robert Oppenheimer[note 1] into a non-observant Jewish family in New York City on April 22, 1904, to Ella (née Friedman), a painter, and Julius Seligmann Oppenheimer, a successful textile importer.[5][6] Robert had a younger brother, Frank, who also became a physicist.[7] Their father was born in Hanau, when it was still part of the Hesse-Nassau province of the Kingdom of Prussia, and as a teenager made his way to the United States in 1888, without money, higher education, or even English. He was hired by a textile company and within a decade was an executive there, eventually becoming wealthy.[8] In 1912, the family moved to an apartment on Riverside Drive near West 88th Street, Manhattan, an area known for luxurious mansions and townhouses.[6] Their art collection included works by Pablo Picasso, Édouard Vuillard, and Vincent van Gogh.[9]

Oppenheimer was initially educated at Alcuin Preparatory School. In 1911, he entered the Ethical Culture Society School,[10] founded by Felix Adler to promote training based on the Ethical Culture movement, whose motto was "Deed before Creed". Oppenheimer's father had been a member of the Society for many years, serving on its board of trustees.[11] Oppenheimer was a versatile student, interested in English and French literature, and particularly mineralogy.[12] He completed third and fourth grades in one year and skipped half of eighth grade.[10] He took private music lessons by famous French flutist Georges Barrère. During his final year of school, Oppenheimer became interested in chemistry.[13] He graduated in 1921, but his further education was delayed a year by an attack of colitis contracted while prospecting in Joachimstal during a family vacation in Czechoslovakia. He recovered in New Mexico, where he developed a love for horseback riding and the southwestern United States.[14]

Oppenheimer entered Harvard College in 1922 at age 18. He majored in chemistry; Harvard also required studies in history, literature, and philosophy or mathematics. To compensate for the delay caused by his illness, he took six courses each term instead of the usual four. He was admitted to the undergraduate honor society Phi Beta Kappa and was granted graduate standing in physics on the basis of independent study, allowing him to bypass basic courses in favor of advanced ones. He was attracted to experimental physics by a course on thermodynamics taught by Percy Bridgman. Oppenheimer graduated from Harvard in 1925 with a Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude, after only three years of study.[15]

Studies in Europe

Fifteen men in suits, and one woman, pose for a group photograph
Heike Kamerlingh Onnes' Laboratory in Leiden, Netherlands, July 1927. Oppenheimer is in the middle row, second from the left.

After being accepted at Christ's College, Cambridge, in 1924, Oppenheimer wrote to Ernest Rutherford requesting permission to work at the Cavendish Laboratory, though Bridgman's letter of recommendation said that Oppenheimer's clumsiness in the laboratory suggested that theoretical, rather than experimental, physics would be his forte. Rutherford was unimpressed, but Oppenheimer went to Cambridge nonetheless;[16] J. J. Thomson ultimately accepted him on the condition that he complete a basic laboratory course.[17]

Oppenheimer was very unhappy at Cambridge and wrote to a friend: "I am having a pretty bad time. The lab work is a terrible bore, and I am so bad at it that it is impossible to feel that I am learning anything."[18] He developed an antagonistic relationship with his tutor, Patrick Blackett, a future Nobel laureate. According to Oppenheimer's friend Francis Fergusson, Oppenheimer once confessed to leaving a poisoned apple on Blackett's desk, and Oppenheimer's parents convinced the university authorities not to expel him. There are no records of either a poisoning incident or probation, but Oppenheimer had regular sessions with a psychiatrist in Harley Street, London.[19][20][21][22] Oppenheimer was a tall, thin chain smoker,[23] who often neglected to eat during periods of intense concentration. Many friends said he could be self-destructive. Fergusson once tried to distract Oppenheimer from apparent depression by telling him about his girlfriend, Frances Keeley, and how he had proposed to her. Oppenheimer did not take the news well. He jumped on Fergusson and tried to strangle him. Oppenheimer was plagued by periods of depression throughout his life,[24][25] and once told his brother, "I need physics more than friends."[26]

In 1926, Oppenheimer left Cambridge for the University of Göttingen to study under Max Born; Göttingen was one of the world's leading centers for theoretical physics. Oppenheimer made friends who went on to great success, including Werner Heisenberg, Pascual Jordan, Wolfgang Pauli, Paul Dirac, Enrico Fermi and Edward Teller. He was enthusiastic in discussions to the point of sometimes taking them over.[27] Maria Goeppert presented Born with a petition signed by herself and others threatening a boycott of the class unless he made Oppenheimer quiet down. Born left it out on his desk where Oppenheimer could read it, and it was effective without a word being said.[28]

Oppenheimer obtained his Doctor of Philosophy degree in March 1927 at age 23, supervised by Born.[29][30] After the oral exam, James Franck, the professor administering it, reportedly said, "I'm glad that's over. He was on the point of questioning me."[31] Oppenheimer published more than a dozen papers while in Europe, including many important contributions to the new field of quantum mechanics. He and Born published a famous paper on the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, which separates nuclear motion from electronic motion in the mathematical treatment of molecules, allowing nuclear motion to be neglected to simplify calculations. It remains his most cited work.[32]

Early career


A group of men pose in front, around, and on a large metal structure.
University of California Radiation Laboratory staff (including Robert R. Wilson and Nobel prize winners Ernest Lawrence, Edwin McMillan, and Luis Alvarez) on the magnet yoke for the 60-inch (152 cm) cyclotron, 1938. Oppenheimer is the tall figure holding a pipe in the top row, just right of center.

Oppenheimer was awarded a United States National Research Council fellowship to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in September 1927. Bridgman also wanted him at Harvard, so a compromise was reached whereby he split his fellowship for the 1927–28 academic year between Harvard in 1927 and Caltech in 1928.[33] At Caltech, he struck up a close friendship with Linus Pauling; they planned to mount a joint attack on the nature of the chemical bond, a field in which Pauling was a pioneer, with Oppenheimer supplying the mathematics and Pauling interpreting the results. The collaboration, and their friendship, ended after Oppenheimer invited Pauling's wife, Ava Helen Pauling, to join him on a tryst in Mexico.[34] Oppenheimer later invited Pauling to be head of the Chemistry Division of the Manhattan Project, but Pauling refused, saying he was a pacifist.[35]

In the autumn of 1928, Oppenheimer visited Paul Ehrenfest's institute at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands, where he impressed by giving lectures in Dutch, despite having little experience with the language. There, he was given the nickname of Opje,[36] later anglicized by his students as "Oppie".[37] From Leiden, he continued on to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich to work with Wolfgang Pauli on quantum mechanics and the continuous spectrum. Oppenheimer respected and liked Pauli and may have emulated his personal style as well as his critical approach to problems.[38]

On returning to the United States, Oppenheimer accepted an associate professorship from the University of California, Berkeley, where Raymond T. Birge wanted him so badly that he expressed a willingness to share him with Caltech.[35]

Before he began his Berkeley professorship, Oppenheimer was diagnosed with a mild case of tuberculosis and spent some weeks with his brother Frank at a New Mexico ranch, which he leased and eventually purchased. When he heard the ranch was available for lease, he exclaimed, "Hot dog!", and he later called it Perro Caliente ("hot dog" in Spanish).[39] Later, he used to say that "physics and desert country" were his "two great loves".[40] He recovered from tuberculosis and returned to Berkeley, where he prospered as an advisor and collaborator to a generation of physicists who admired him for his intellectual virtuosity and broad interests. His students and colleagues saw him as mesmerizing: hypnotic in private interaction, but often frigid in more public settings. His associates fell into two camps: one saw him as an aloof and impressive genius and aesthete, the other as a pretentious and insecure poseur.[41] His students almost always fell into the former category, adopting his walk, speech, and other mannerisms, and even his inclination for reading entire texts in their original languages.[42] Hans Bethe said of him:

Probably the most important ingredient he brought to his teaching was his exquisite taste. He always knew what were the important problems, as shown by his choice of subjects. He truly lived with those problems, struggling for a solution, and he communicated his concern to the group. In its heyday, there were about eight or ten graduate students in his group and about six Post-doctoral Fellows. He met this group once a day in his office and discussed with one after another the status of the student's research problem. He was interested in everything, and in one afternoon they might discuss quantum electrodynamics, cosmic rays, electron pair production and nuclear physics.[43]

Oppenheimer worked closely with Nobel Prize-winning experimental physicist Ernest O. Lawrence and his cyclotron pioneers, helping them understand the data that their machines were producing at Berkeley's Radiation Laboratory, which eventually developed into today's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.[44] In 1936, Berkeley promoted him to full professor at an annual salary of $3,300 (equivalent to $72,000 in 2023). In return, he was asked to curtail his teaching at Caltech, so a compromise was reached whereby Berkeley released him for six weeks each year, enough to teach one term at Caltech.[45]

Oppenheimer repeatedly attempted to get Robert Serber a position at Berkeley but was blocked by Birge, who felt that "one Jew in the department was enough".[46]

Scientific work

Oppenheimer did important research in theoretical astronomy (especially as related to general relativity and nuclear theory), nuclear physics, spectroscopy, and quantum field theory, including its extension into quantum electrodynamics. The formal mathematics of relativistic quantum mechanics also attracted his attention, although he doubted its validity. His work predicted many later finds, including the neutron, meson and neutron star.[47]

Initially, his major interest was the theory of the continuous spectrum. His first published paper, in 1926, concerned the quantum theory of molecular band spectra. He developed a method to carry out calculations of its transition probabilities. He calculated the photoelectric effect for hydrogen and X-rays, obtaining the absorption coefficient at the K-edge. His calculations accorded with observations of the X-ray absorption of the Sun, but not helium. Years later, it was realized that the Sun was largely composed of hydrogen and that his calculations were correct.[48][49]

Oppenheimer made important contributions to the theory of cosmic ray showers. He also worked on the problem of field electron emission.[50][51] This work contributed to the development of the concept of quantum tunneling.[52] In 1931, he co-wrote a paper, "Relativistic Theory of the Photoelectric Effect," with his student Harvey Hall,[53] in which, based on empirical evidence, he correctly disputed Paul Dirac's assertion that two of the energy levels of the hydrogen atom have the same energy. Subsequently, one of his doctoral students, Willis Lamb, determined that this was a consequence of what became known as the Lamb shift, for which Lamb was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1955.[47]

With Melba Phillips, the first graduate student to begin her PhD under Oppenheimer's supervision,[note 2] Oppenheimer worked on calculations of artificial radioactivity under bombardment by deuterons. When Ernest Lawrence and Edwin McMillan bombarded nuclei with deuterons they found the results agreed closely with the predictions of George Gamow, but when higher energies and heavier nuclei were involved, the results did not conform to the predictions. In 1935, Oppenheimer and Phillips worked out a theory—subsequently known as the Oppenheimer–Phillips process—to explain the results. This theory is still in use today.[55][note 3]

As early as 1930, Oppenheimer wrote a paper that essentially predicted the existence of the positron. This was after a paper by Dirac proposed that electrons could have both a positive charge and negative energy. Dirac's paper introduced an equation, later known as the Dirac equation, that unified quantum mechanics, special relativity and the then-new concept of electron spin, to explain the Zeeman effect.[57] Drawing on the body of experimental evidence, Oppenheimer rejected the idea that the predicted positively charged electrons were protons. He argued that they would have to have the same mass as an electron, whereas experiments showed that protons were much heavier than electrons. Two years later, Carl David Anderson discovered the positron, for which he received the 1936 Nobel Prize in Physics.[58]

In the late 1930s, Oppenheimer became interested in astrophysics, most likely through his friendship with Richard Tolman, resulting in a series of papers. In the first of these, "On the Stability of Stellar Neutron Cores" (1938),[59] co-written with Serber, Oppenheimer explored the properties of white dwarfs. This was followed by a paper co-written with one of his students, George Volkoff, "On Massive Neutron Cores,"[60] which demonstrated that there was a limit, known as the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit, to the mass of stars beyond which they would not remain stable as neutron stars and would undergo gravitational collapse. In 1939, Oppenheimer and another of his students, Hartland Snyder, produced the paper "On Continued Gravitational Contraction",[61] which predicted the existence of what later became termed black holes. After the Born–Oppenheimer approximation paper, these papers remain his most cited, and were key factors in the rejuvenation of astrophysical research in the United States in the 1950s, mainly by John A. Wheeler.[62]

Oppenheimer's papers were considered difficult to understand even by the standards of the abstract topics he was expert in. He was fond of using elegant, if extremely complex, mathematical techniques to demonstrate physical principles, though he was sometimes criticized for making mathematical mistakes, presumably out of haste. "His physics was good", said his student Snyder, "but his arithmetic awful."[47]

After World War II, Oppenheimer published only five scientific papers, one of them in biophysics, and none after 1950. Murray Gell-Mann, a later Nobelist who, as a visiting scientist, worked with him at the Institute for Advanced Study in 1951, offered this opinion:

He didn't have Sitzfleisch, "sitting flesh," when you sit on a chair. As far as I know, he never wrote a long paper or did a long calculation, anything of that kind. He didn't have patience for that; his own work consisted of little aperçus, but quite brilliant ones. But he inspired other people to do things, and his influence was fantastic.[63]

Private and political life

A man in a suit seated, smoking a cigarette.
Oppenheimer in 1946

Oppenheimer's mother died in 1931, and he became closer to his father who, although still living in New York, became a frequent visitor in California.[64] When his father died in 1937, leaving $392,602 (equivalent to $8.3 million in 2023) to be divided between Oppenheimer and his brother Frank, Oppenheimer immediately wrote out a will that left his estate to the University of California to be used for graduate scholarships.[65]


During the 1920s, Oppenheimer remained uninformed on world affairs. He claimed that he did not read newspapers or popular magazines and only learned of the Wall Street crash of 1929 while he was on a walk with Ernest Lawrence six months after the crash occurred.[66][67] He once remarked that he never cast a vote until the 1936 presidential election. From 1934 on, he became increasingly concerned about politics and international affairs. In 1934, he earmarked three percent of his annual salary—about $100 (equivalent to $2,300 in 2023)—for two years to support German physicists fleeing Nazi Germany.[68] During the 1934 West Coast Waterfront Strike, he and some of his students, including Melba Phillips and Serber, attended a longshoremen's rally.[46]

After the Spanish Civil War broke out in 1936, Oppenheimer hosted fundraisers for the Spanish Republican cause. In 1939, he joined the American Committee for Democracy and Intellectual Freedom, which campaigned against the persecution of Jewish scientists in Nazi Germany. Like most liberal groups of the era, the committee was later branded a communist front.[68]

Many of Oppenheimer's closest associates were active in the Communist Party in the 1930s or 1940s, including his brother Frank, Frank's wife Jackie,[69] Kitty,[70] Jean Tatlock, his landlady Mary Ellen Washburn,[71] and several of his graduate students at Berkeley.[72] Whether Oppenheimer was a party member has been debated. Cassidy states that he never openly joined the Communist Party USA (CPUSA),[68] but Haynes, Klehr, and Vassiliev state that he "was, in fact, a concealed member of the CPUSA in the late 1930s".[73] From 1937 to 1942, Oppenheimer was a member at Berkeley of what he called a "discussion group", which fellow members Haakon Chevalier[74][75] and Gordon Griffiths later said was a "closed" (secret) unit of the Communist Party for Berkeley faculty.[76]

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) opened a file on Oppenheimer in March 1941. It recorded that he attended a meeting in December 1940 at Chevalier's home that was also attended by the Communist Party's California state secretary, William Schneiderman, and its treasurer, Isaac Folkoff. The FBI noted that Oppenheimer was on the executive committee of the American Civil Liberties Union, which it considered a communist front organization. Shortly thereafter, the FBI added Oppenheimer to its Custodial Detention Index, for arrest in case of national emergency.[77]

When he joined the Manhattan Project in 1942, Oppenheimer wrote on his personal security questionnaire that he had been "a member of just about every Communist Front organization on the West Coast."[78] Years later, he claimed that he did not remember writing this, that it was not true, and that if he had written anything along those lines, it was "a half-jocular overstatement".[79] He was a subscriber to the People's World,[80] a Communist Party organ, and testified in 1954, "I was associated with the communist movement."[81]

In 1953, Oppenheimer was on the sponsoring committee for a conference on "Science and Freedom" organized by the Congress for Cultural Freedom, an anti-communist cultural organization.[82]

At his 1954 security clearance hearings, Oppenheimer denied being a member of the Communist Party but identified himself as a fellow traveler, which he defined as someone who agrees with many of communism's goals but is not willing to blindly follow orders from any Communist Party apparatus.[83] According to biographer Ray Monk: "He was, in a very practical and real sense, a supporter of the Communist Party. Moreover, in terms of the time, effort and money spent on party activities, he was a very committed supporter."[84]

Relationships and children

In 1936, Oppenheimer became involved with Jean Tatlock, the daughter of a Berkeley literature professor and a student at Stanford University School of Medicine. The two had similar political views; she wrote for the Western Worker, a Communist Party newspaper.[85] In 1939, after a tempestuous relationship, Tatlock broke up with Oppenheimer. In August of that year, he met Katherine ("Kitty") Puening, a radical Berkeley student and former Communist Party member. Kitty's first marriage had lasted only a few months. Her second, common-law, husband from 1934 to 1937 was Joe Dallet, an active member of the Communist Party killed in 1937 in the Spanish Civil War.[86]

Kitty returned from Europe to the U.S., where she obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in botany from the University of Pennsylvania. In 1938 she married Richard Harrison, a physician and medical researcher, and in June 1939 moved with him to Pasadena, California, where he became chief of radiology at a local hospital and she enrolled as a graduate student at the University of California, Los Angeles. She and Oppenheimer created a minor scandal by sleeping together after one of Tolman's parties, and in the summer of 1940 she stayed with Oppenheimer at his ranch in New Mexico. When she became pregnant, Kitty asked Harrison for a divorce and he agreed to it. On November 1, 1940, she obtained a quick divorce in Reno, Nevada, and married Oppenheimer.[87][88]

Their first child, Peter, was born in May 1941, and their second, Katherine ("Toni"), was born in Los Alamos, New Mexico, on December 7, 1944.[89] During his marriage, Oppenheimer rekindled his affair with Tatlock.[90] Later, their continued contact became an issue in his security clearance hearings because of Tatlock's communist associations.[91]

Throughout the development of the atomic bomb, Oppenheimer was under investigation by both the FBI and the Manhattan Project's internal security arm for his past left-wing associations. He was followed by Army security agents during a trip to California in June 1943 to visit Tatlock, who was suffering from depression. Oppenheimer spent the night in her apartment.[92] Tatlock killed herself on January 4, 1944, leaving Oppenheimer deeply grieved.[93]

At Los Alamos, Oppenheimer began an emotional affair with Ruth Tolman, a psychologist and the wife of his friend Richard Tolman. The affair ended after Oppenheimer returned east to become director of the Institute for Advanced Study but, after Richard's death in August 1948, they reconnected and saw each other occasionally until Ruth's death in 1957. Few of their letters survive, but those that do reflect a close and affectionate relationship, with Oppenheimer calling her "My Love".[94][95]


Oppenheimer worked very hard [in the spring of 1929] but had a gift of concealing his assiduous application with an air of easy nonchalance. Actually, he was engaged in a very difficult calculation of the opacity of surfaces of stars to their internal radiation, an important constant in the theoretical construction of stellar models. He spoke little of these problems and seemed to be much more interested in literature, especially the Hindu classics and the more esoteric Western writers. Pauli once remarked to me that Oppenheimer seemed to treat physics as an avocation and psychoanalysis as a vocation.

Isidor Isaac Rabi[96]

Oppenheimer's diverse interests sometimes interrupted his focus on science. He liked things that were difficult and since much of the scientific work appeared easy for him, he developed an interest in the mystical and the cryptic.[97] After going to Harvard, he began to acquaint himself with the classical Hindu texts through their English translations.[98] He also had an interest in learning languages and learned Sanskrit,[note 4] under Arthur W. Ryder at Berkeley in 1933.[100][101] He eventually read literary works such as the Bhagavad Gita and Meghaduta in the original Sanskrit, and deeply pondered them. He later cited the Gita as one of the books that most shaped his philosophy of life.[102][103] He wrote to his brother that the Gita was "very easy and quite marvelous". He later called it "the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue", and gave copies of it as presents to his friends and kept a personal, worn-out copy on the bookshelf by his desk. He kept referring to it while directing the Los Alamos Laboratory, and quoted a passage from the Gita at the memorial service of President Franklin Roosevelt in Los Alamos.[104][101] He nicknamed his car Garuda, the mount bird of the Hindu god Vishnu.[105]

Oppenheimer never became a Hindu in the traditional sense; he did not join any temple nor pray to any god.[106][107] He "was really taken by the charm and the general wisdom of the Bhagavad-Gita," his brother said.[106] It is speculated that Oppenheimer's interest in Hindu thought started during his earlier association with Niels Bohr. Both Bohr and Oppenheimer had been very analytical and critical about the ancient Hindu mythological stories and the metaphysics embedded in them. In one conversation with David Hawkins before the war, while talking about the literature of ancient Greece, Oppenheimer remarked, "I have read the Greeks; I find the Hindus deeper."[108] During the 1930s, while teaching at Berkeley, Oppenheimer became part of a group in the Bay Area that psychologist Siegfried Bernfeld convened to discuss psychoanalysis.[109]

His close confidant and colleague Isidor Isaac Rabi, who had seen Oppenheimer throughout his Berkeley, Los Alamos, and Princeton years, wondering "why men of Oppenheimer's gifts do not discover everything worth discovering",[110] reflected that:

Oppenheimer was overeducated in those fields which lie outside the scientific tradition, such as his interest in religion, in the Hindu religion in particular, which resulted in a feeling for the mystery of the universe that surrounded him almost like a fog. He saw physics clearly, looking toward what had already been done, but at the border he tended to feel there was much more of the mysterious and novel than there actually was ... [he turned] away from the hard, crude methods of theoretical physics into a mystical realm of broad intuition.... In Oppenheimer the element of earthiness was feeble. Yet it was essentially this spiritual quality, this refinement as expressed in speech and manner, that was the basis of his charisma. He never expressed himself completely. He always left a feeling that there were depths of sensibility and insight not yet revealed. These may be the qualities of the born leader who seems to have reserves of uncommitted strength.[111]

In spite of this, observers such as physicists Luis Alvarez and Jeremy Bernstein have suggested that if Oppenheimer had lived long enough to see his predictions substantiated by experiment, he might have won a Nobel Prize for his work on gravitational collapse, concerning neutron stars and black holes.[112][113][114] In retrospect, some physicists and historians consider this his most important contribution, though it was not taken up by other scientists in his lifetime.[115] The physicist and historian Abraham Pais once asked Oppenheimer what he considered his most important scientific contributions—Oppenheimer cited his work on electrons and positrons, not his work on gravitational contraction.[116] Oppenheimer was nominated for the Nobel Prize for physics three times, in 1946, 1951 and 1967, but never won.[117][118]

Manhattan Project

Los Alamos

On October 9, 1941, two months before the United States entered World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt approved a crash program to develop an atomic bomb. Ernest Lawrence brought Oppenheimer into the Manhattan Project on October 21. Oppenheimer was assigned to take over the project's specific bomb-design research by Arthur Compton at the Metallurgical Laboratory.[119] On May 18, 1942,[120] National Defense Research Committee Chairman James B. Conant, who had been one of Oppenheimer's lecturers at Harvard, asked Oppenheimer to take over work on fast neutron calculations, a task Oppenheimer threw himself into with full vigor. He was given the title "Coordinator of Rapid Rupture"; "rapid rupture" is a technical term that refers to the propagation of a fast neutron chain reaction in an atomic bomb. One of his first acts was to host a summer school for atomic bomb theory in Berkeley. The mix of European physicists and his own students—a group including Serber, Emil Konopinski, Felix Bloch, Hans Bethe, and Edward Teller—kept themselves busy by calculating what needed to be done, and in what order, to make the bomb.[121][122]

Mug shot with "K-6" over it.
Oppenheimer's ID photo from the Los Alamos Laboratory

In June 1942, the U.S. Army established the Manhattan Engineer District to handle its part in the atom bomb project, beginning the process of transferring responsibility from the Office of Scientific Research and Development to the military.[123] In September, Brigadier General Leslie R. Groves Jr., was appointed director of what became known as the Manhattan Project.[124] By October 12, 1942, Groves and Oppenheimer had decided that for security and cohesion, they needed to establish a centralized, secret research laboratory in a remote location.[125]

Groves selected Oppenheimer to head the project's secret weapons laboratory, although it is not known precisely when.[126] This decision surprised many, because Oppenheimer had left-wing political views and no record as a leader of large projects. Groves worried that because Oppenheimer did not have a Nobel Prize, he might not have had the prestige to direct fellow scientists,[127] but Groves was impressed by Oppenheimer's singular grasp of the practical aspects of the project and by the breadth of his knowledge. As a military engineer, Groves knew that this would be vital in an interdisciplinary project that would involve not just physics but also chemistry, metallurgy, ordnance, and engineering. Groves also detected in Oppenheimer something that many others did not, an "overweening ambition",[128] which Groves reckoned would supply the drive necessary to push the project to a successful conclusion.[128] Oppenheimer's past associations were not overlooked, but on July 20, 1943, Groves directed that he receive a security clearance "without delay irrespective of the information which you have concerning Mr Oppenheimer. He is absolutely essential to the project."[129] Rabi considered Oppenheimer's appointment "a real stroke of genius on the part of General Groves, who was not generally considered to be a genius".[130]

Oppenheimer favored a location for the laboratory in New Mexico, not far from his ranch. On November 16, 1942, he, Groves and others toured a prospective site. Oppenheimer feared that the high cliffs surrounding it would feel claustrophobic, and there was concern about possible flooding. He then suggested a site he knew well: a flat mesa near Santa Fe, New Mexico, which was the site of a private boys' school, the Los Alamos Ranch School. The engineers were concerned about the poor access road and the water supply but otherwise felt that it was ideal.[131] The Los Alamos Laboratory was built on the site of the school, taking over some of its buildings, while many new buildings were erected in great haste. At the laboratory, Oppenheimer assembled a group of the top physicists of the time, whom he called the "luminaries".[132]

Los Alamos was initially supposed to be a military laboratory, and Oppenheimer and other researchers were to be commissioned into the Army. He went so far as to order himself a lieutenant colonel's uniform and take the Army physical test, which he failed. Army doctors considered him underweight at 128 pounds (58 kg), diagnosed his chronic cough as tuberculosis, and were concerned about his chronic lumbosacral joint pain.[133] The plan to commission scientists fell through when Rabi and Robert Bacher balked at the idea. Conant, Groves, and Oppenheimer devised a compromise whereby the University of California operated the laboratory under contract to the War Department.[134] It soon turned out that Oppenheimer had hugely underestimated the magnitude of the project: Los Alamos grew from a few hundred people in 1943 to over 6,000 in 1945.[133]

Oppenheimer at first had difficulty with the organizational division of large groups but rapidly learned the art of large-scale administration after he took up permanent residence at Los Alamos. He was noted for his mastery of all scientific aspects of the project and for his efforts to control the inevitable cultural conflicts between scientists and the military. Victor Weisskopf wrote:

Oppenheimer directed these studies, theoretical and experimental, in the real sense of the words. Here his uncanny speed in grasping the main points of any subject was a decisive factor; he could acquaint himself with the essential details of every part of the work.

He did not direct from the head office. He was intellectually and physically present at each decisive step. He was present in the laboratory or in the seminar rooms, when a new effect was measured, when a new idea was conceived. It was not that he contributed so many ideas or suggestions; he did so sometimes, but his main influence came from something else. It was his continuous and intense presence, which produced a sense of direct participation in all of us; it created that unique atmosphere of enthusiasm and challenge that pervaded the place throughout its time.[135]

Bomb design

two men, one in military uniform and another in a suit, having a discussion
Leslie Groves, military head of the Manhattan Project, with Oppenheimer in 1942

At this point in the war, there was considerable anxiety among the scientists that the German nuclear weapons program might be progressing faster than the Manhattan Project.[136][137] In a letter dated May 25, 1943, Oppenheimer responded to a proposal by Fermi to use radioactive materials to poison German food supplies. Oppenheimer asked Fermi whether he could produce enough strontium without letting too many in on the secret. Oppenheimer continued, "I think we should not attempt a plan unless we can poison food sufficient to kill a half a million men."[138]

In 1943, development efforts were directed to a plutonium gun-type fission weapon called "Thin Man". Initial research on the properties of plutonium was done using cyclotron-generated plutonium-239, which was extremely pure but could be created only in tiny amounts. When Los Alamos received the first sample of plutonium from the X-10 Graphite Reactor in April 1944, a problem was discovered: reactor-bred plutonium had a higher concentration of plutonium-240 (five times that of "cyclotron" plutonium), making it unsuitable for use in a gun-type weapon.[139]

In July 1944, Oppenheimer abandoned the Thin Man gun design in favor of an implosion-type weapon; a smaller version of Thin Man became Little Boy. Using chemical explosive lenses, a sub-critical sphere of fissile material could be squeezed into a smaller and denser form. The metal needed to travel only very short distances, so the critical mass would be assembled in much less time.[140] In August 1944, Oppenheimer implemented a sweeping reorganization of the Los Alamos laboratory to focus on implosion.[141] He concentrated the development efforts on the gun-type device, but now with a simpler design that only had to work with highly enriched uranium, in a single group. This device became Little Boy in February 1945.[142] After a mammoth research effort, the more complex design of the implosion device, known as the "Christy gadget" after Robert Christy, another student of Oppenheimer's,[143] was finalized as Fat Man in a meeting in Oppenheimer's office on February 28, 1945.[144]

In May 1945, an Interim Committee was created to advise and report on wartime and postwar policies regarding the use of nuclear energy. The Interim Committee established a scientific panel consisting of Oppenheimer, Arthur Compton, Fermi, and Lawrence to advise it on scientific issues. In its presentation to the Interim Committee, the panel offered its opinion not just on an atomic bomb's likely physical effects but also on its likely military and political impact.[145] This included opinions on such sensitive issues as whether the Soviet Union should be advised of the weapon in advance of its use against Japan.[146]


a large mushroom-shaped cloud forming after a nuclear explosion
The Trinity test was the first detonation of a nuclear device.[147]

In the early morning hours of July 16, 1945, near Alamogordo, New Mexico, the work at Los Alamos culminated in the test of the world's first nuclear weapon. Oppenheimer had code-named the site "Trinity" in mid-1944, saying later that the name came from John Donne's Holy Sonnets; he had been introduced to Donne's work in the 1930s by Jean Tatlock, who killed herself in January 1944.[148][149]

Brigadier General Thomas Farrell, who was present in the control bunker with Oppenheimer, recalled:

Dr. Oppenheimer, on whom had rested a very heavy burden, grew tenser as the last seconds ticked off. He scarcely breathed. He held on to a post to steady himself. For the last few seconds, he stared directly ahead and then when the announcer shouted "Now!" and there came this tremendous burst of light followed shortly thereafter by the deep growling roar of the explosion, his face relaxed into an expression of tremendous relief.[150]

Oppenheimer's brother Frank recalled Oppenheimer's first words as "I guess it worked."[151][152]

External videos
video icon Oppenheimer recalling his thoughts after witnessing the Trinity test
Two men, one in a suit and hat and the other in military uniform, stand in front of twisted metal whilst wearing white overshoes
Oppenheimer and Groves at the remains of the Trinity test tower. Oppenheimer is wearing his trademark broad-brimmed hat; white overshoes protect against fallout.[153]

According to a 1949 magazine profile, while witnessing the explosion Oppenheimer thought of verses from the Bhagavad Gita: "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one ... Now I am become Death, the shatterer of worlds."[154] In 1965 he recalled the moment this way:

We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and, to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.[155][note 5]

Rabi described seeing Oppenheimer somewhat later: "I'll never forget his walk ... like High Noon ... this kind of strut. He had done it."[162] Despite many scientists' opposition to using the bomb on Japan, Compton, Fermi, and Oppenheimer believed that a test explosion would not convince Japan to surrender.[163] At an August 6 assembly at Los Alamos, the evening of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, Oppenheimer took to the stage and clasped his hands together "like a prize-winning boxer" while the crowd cheered. He expressed regret that the weapon was ready too late for use against Nazi Germany.[164]

On August 17, however, Oppenheimer traveled to Washington to hand-deliver a letter to Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson expressing his revulsion and his wish to see nuclear weapons banned.[165] In October he met with President Harry S. Truman, who dismissed Oppenheimer's concern about an arms race with the Soviet Union and belief that atomic energy should be under international control. Truman became infuriated when Oppenheimer said, "Mr. President, I feel I have blood on my hands", responding that he (Truman) bore sole responsibility for the decision to use atomic weapons against Japan, and later said, "I don't want to see that son of a bitch in this office ever again."[166][167]

For his services as director of Los Alamos, Oppenheimer was awarded the Medal for Merit by Truman in 1946.[168]

Postwar activities

Once the public learned of the Manhattan Project after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Oppenheimer—suddenly a household name as the "father of the atomic bomb"—became a national spokesman for science, emblematic of a new type of technocratic power;[93][169][170] he appeared on the covers of Life and Time.[171][172] Nuclear physics became a powerful force as nations realized the strategic and political power that atomic weapons conferred. Like many scientists of his generation, Oppenheimer felt that security from atomic bombs could come only from a transnational organization such as the newly formed United Nations, which could institute a program to stifle a nuclear arms race.[173]

Institute for Advanced Study

Einstein writing at a desk. Oppenheimer sits beside him, looking on.
Oppenheimer and Albert Einstein had been colleagues and shared a cordial relationship with each other. c. 1950

In November 1945, Oppenheimer left Los Alamos to return to Caltech,[174] but soon found that his heart was no longer in teaching.[175] In 1947, he accepted an offer from Lewis Strauss to take up the directorship of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. This meant moving back east and leaving Ruth Tolman, the wife of his friend Richard Tolman, with whom he had begun an affair after leaving Los Alamos.[176] The job came with a salary of $20,000 per annum, plus rent-free accommodation in the director's house, a 17th-century manor with a cook and groundskeeper, surrounded by 265 acres (107 ha) of woodlands.[177] He collected European furniture, and French post-impressionist and Fauvist artworks. His art collection included works by Cézanne, Derain, Despiau, de Vlaminck, Picasso, Rembrandt, Renoir, Van Gogh and Vuillard.[178]

Oppenheimer brought together intellectuals at the height of their powers and from a variety of disciplines to answer the most pertinent questions of the age. He directed and encouraged the research of many well-known scientists, including Freeman Dyson, and the duo of Chen Ning Yang and Tsung-Dao Lee, who won a Nobel Prize for their discovery of parity non-conservation. He also instituted temporary memberships for scholars from the humanities, such as T. S. Eliot and George F. Kennan. Some of these activities were resented by a few members of the mathematics faculty, who wanted the institute to stay a bastion of pure scientific research. Abraham Pais said that Oppenheimer himself thought that one of his failures at the institute was being unable to bring together scholars from the natural sciences and the humanities.[179]

During a series of conferences in New York from 1947 through 1949, physicists transitioned from war work back to theoretical issues. Under Oppenheimer's direction, physicists tackled the greatest outstanding problem of the pre-war years: infinite, divergent, and seemingly nonsensical expressions in the quantum electrodynamics of elementary particles. Julian Schwinger, Richard Feynman and Shin'ichiro Tomonaga tackled the problem of regularization, and developed techniques that became known as renormalization. Freeman Dyson was able to prove that their procedures gave similar results. The problem of meson absorption and Hideki Yukawa's theory of mesons as the carrier particles of the strong nuclear force were also tackled. Probing questions from Oppenheimer prompted Robert Marshak's innovative two-meson hypothesis: that there are actually two types of mesons, pions and muons. This led to Cecil Frank Powell's breakthrough and subsequent Nobel Prize for the discovery of the pion.[180][note 6]

Oppenheimer served as director of the institute until 1966, when he gave up the position due to his failing health.[182] As of 2023[update], he is the longest-serving director of the institute.[183]

Atomic Energy Commission

The GAC in 1947; Oppenheimer is second from the left.

As a member of the Board of Consultants to a committee appointed by Truman, Oppenheimer strongly influenced the 1946 Acheson–Lilienthal Report. In this report, the committee advocated the creation of an international Atomic Development Authority, which would own all fissionable material and the means of its production, such as mines and laboratories, and atomic power plants where it could be used for peaceful energy production. Bernard Baruch was appointed to translate this report into a proposal to the United Nations, resulting in the Baruch Plan of 1946. The Baruch Plan introduced many additional provisions regarding enforcement, in particular requiring inspection of the Soviet Union's uranium resources. It was seen as an attempt to maintain the United States' nuclear monopoly and rejected by the Soviets. With this, it became clear to Oppenheimer that an arms race was unavoidable, due to the mutual suspicion of the United States and the Soviet Union,[184] which even Oppenheimer was starting to distrust.[185]

After the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) came into being in 1947 as a civilian agency in control of nuclear research and weapons issues, Oppenheimer was appointed as the chairman of its General Advisory Committee (GAC). From this position, he advised on a number of nuclear-related issues, including project funding, laboratory construction and even international policy—though the GAC's advice was not always heeded.[186] As chairman of the GAC, Oppenheimer lobbied vigorously for international arms control and funding for basic science, and attempted to influence policy away from a heated arms race.[187]

The first atomic bomb test by the Soviet Union in August 1949 came earlier than Americans expected, and over the next several months, there was an intense debate within the U.S. government, military, and scientific communities over whether to proceed with the development of the far more powerful, nuclear fusion–based hydrogen bomb, then known as "the Super".[188] Oppenheimer had been aware of the possibility of a thermonuclear weapon since the days of the Manhattan Project and had allocated a limited amount of theoretical research work toward the possibility at the time, but nothing more than that, given the pressing need to develop a fission weapon.[189] Immediately following the end of the war, Oppenheimer argued against continuing work on the Super at that time, due to both lack of need and the enormous human casualties that would result from its use.[190][191]

Now in October 1949, Oppenheimer and the GAC recommended against the development of the Super.[192] He and the other GAC members were motivated partly by ethical concerns, feeling that such a weapon could only be strategically used, resulting in millions of deaths: "Its use therefore carries much further than the atomic bomb itself the policy of exterminating civilian populations."[193] They also had practical qualms, as there was no workable design for a hydrogen bomb at the time.[194] Regarding the possibility of the Soviet Union developing a thermonuclear weapon, the GAC felt that the United States could have an adequate stockpile of atomic weapons to retaliate against any thermonuclear attack.[195] In that connection, Oppenheimer and the others were concerned about the opportunity costs that would be incurred if nuclear reactors were diverted from materials needed for atom bomb production to the materials such as tritium needed for a thermonuclear weapon.[196][197]

A majority of the AEC subsequently endorsed the GAC recommendation, and Oppenheimer thought that the fight against the Super would triumph, but proponents of the weapon lobbied the White House vigorously.[198] On January 31, 1950, Truman, who was predisposed to proceed with the development of the weapon anyway, made the formal decision to do so.[199] Oppenheimer and other GAC opponents of the project, especially James Conant, felt disheartened and considered resigning from the committee.[200] They stayed on, though their views on the hydrogen bomb were well known.[201]

In 1951, Teller and mathematician Stanislaw Ulam developed the Teller–Ulam design for a hydrogen bomb.[202] This new design seemed technically feasible and Oppenheimer officially acceded to the weapon's development,[203] while still looking for ways in which its testing or deployment or use could be questioned.[204] As he later recalled:

The program we had in 1949 was a tortured thing that you could well argue did not make a great deal of technical sense. It was therefore possible to argue also that you did not want it even if you could have it. The program in 1951 was technically so sweet that you could not argue about that. The issues became purely the military, the political and the humane problem of what you were going to do about it once you had it.[205]

Oppenheimer, Conant, and Lee DuBridge, another member who had opposed the H-bomb decision, left the GAC when their terms expired in August 1952.[206] Truman had declined to reappoint them, as he wanted new voices on the committee who were more in support of H-bomb development.[207] In addition, various opponents of Oppenheimer had communicated to Truman their desire that Oppenheimer leave the committee.[208]

Panels and study groups

A group of formally dressed people sit in the audience, on folding chairs, and listen to a lecture
The 1946 Los Alamos colloquium on the Super. In the front row are Norris Bradbury, John Manley, Enrico Fermi and J. M. B. Kellogg. Behind Manley is Oppenheimer (wearing jacket and tie), and to his left is Richard Feynman. The Army colonel on the far left is Oliver Haywood. In the third row between Haywood and Oppenheimer is Edward Teller.

Oppenheimer played a role on a number of government panels and study projects during the late 1940s and early 1950s, some of which thrust him into controversies and power struggles.[209]

In 1948, Oppenheimer chaired the Department of Defense's Long-Range Objectives Panel, a body created by AEC liaison Donald F. Carpenter.[210] It looked at the military utility of nuclear weapons, including how they might be delivered.[211] After a year's worth of study, in spring 1952, Oppenheimer wrote the draft report of Project GABRIEL, which examined the dangers of nuclear fallout.[212] Oppenheimer was also a member of the Science Advisory Committee of the Office of Defense Mobilization.[213]

Oppenheimer participated in Project Charles during 1951, which examined the possibility of creating an effective air defense of the United States against atomic attack, and in the follow-on Project East River in 1952, which, with Oppenheimer's input, recommended building a warning system that would provide one-hour notice of an impending atomic attack against American cities.[212] Those two projects led to Project Lincoln in 1952, a large effort on which Oppenheimer was one of the senior scientists.[212] Undertaken at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, which had recently been founded to study issues of air defense, this in turn led to the Lincoln Summer Study Group, in which Oppenheimer became a key figure.[214] Oppenheimer's and other scientists' urging that resources be allocated to air defense in preference to large retaliatory strike capabilities brought an immediate response of objection from the United States Air Force (USAF),[215] and debate ensued about whether Oppenheimer and allied scientists, or the Air Force, was embracing an inflexible "Maginot Line" philosophy.[216] In any case, the Summer Study Group's work eventually led to the building of the Distant Early Warning Line.[217]

Teller, who had been so uninterested in work on the atomic bomb at Los Alamos during the war that Oppenheimer had given him time instead to work on his own project of the hydrogen bomb,[218] left Los Alamos in 1951 to help found, in 1952, a second laboratory at what would become the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.[219] Oppenheimer had defended the history of work done at Los Alamos and opposed the creation of the second laboratory.[220]

Project Vista looked at improving U.S. tactical warfare capabilities.[212] Oppenheimer was a late addition to the project in 1951 but wrote a key chapter of the report that challenged the doctrine of strategic bombardment and advocated smaller tactical nuclear weapons which would be more useful in a limited theater conflict against enemy forces.[221] Strategic thermonuclear weapons delivered by long-range jet bombers would necessarily be under the control of the U.S. Air Force, whereas the Vista conclusions recommended an increased role for the U.S. Army and U.S. Navy as well.[222] The Air Force reaction to this was immediately hostile,[223] and it succeeded in getting the Vista report suppressed.[224]

During 1952, Oppenheimer chaired the five-member State Department Panel of Consultants on Disarmament,[225] which first urged that the United States postpone its planned first test of the hydrogen bomb and seek a thermonuclear test ban with the Soviet Union, on the grounds that avoiding a test might forestall the development of a catastrophic new weapon and open the way for new arms agreements between the two nations.[226] But the panel lacked political allies in Washington, and the Ivy Mike shot went ahead as scheduled.[225] The panel then issued a final report in January 1953, which, influenced by many of Oppenheimer's deeply felt beliefs, presented a pessimistic vision of the future in which neither the United States nor the Soviet Union could establish effective nuclear superiority but both sides could inflict terrible damage on the other.[227]

One of the panel's recommendations, which Oppenheimer felt was especially important,[228] was that the U.S. government practice less secrecy and more openness toward the American people about the realities of the nuclear balance and the dangers of nuclear warfare.[227] This notion found a receptive audience in the new Eisenhower administration and led to the creation of Operation Candor.[229] Oppenheimer subsequently presented his view on the lack of utility of ever-larger nuclear arsenals to the American public in a June 1953 article in Foreign Affairs,[230][231] and it received attention in major American newspapers.[232]

Thus by 1953, Oppenheimer had reached another peak of influence, being involved in multiple different government posts and projects and having access to crucial strategic plans and force levels.[116] But at the same time, he had become the enemy of the proponents of strategic bombardment, who viewed his opposition to the H-bomb, followed by these accumulated positions and stances, with a combination of bitterness and distrust.[233] This view was paired with their fear that Oppenheimer's fame and powers of persuasion had made him dangerously influential in government, military, and scientific circles.[234]

Security hearing

They sit in the Oval Office and have a discussion
President Dwight D. Eisenhower receives a report from Lewis L. Strauss, Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, on the Operation Castle hydrogen bomb tests in the Pacific, March 30, 1954. Strauss pressed for Oppenheimer's security clearance to be revoked.

The FBI under J. Edgar Hoover had been following Oppenheimer since before the war, when he showed Communist sympathies as a professor at Berkeley and had been close to members of the Communist Party, including his wife and brother. They strongly suspected that he himself was a member of the party, based on wiretaps in which party members referred to him or appeared to refer to him as a communist, as well as reports from informers within the party.[235] He had been under close surveillance since the early 1940s, his home and office bugged, his phone tapped and his mail opened.[236]

In August 1943, Oppenheimer told Manhattan Project security agents that George Eltenton, whom he did not know, had solicited three men at Los Alamos for nuclear secrets on behalf of the Soviet Union. When pressed on the issue in later interviews, Oppenheimer admitted that the only person who had approached him was his friend Haakon Chevalier, a Berkeley professor of French literature, who had mentioned the matter privately at a dinner at Oppenheimer's house.[237]

The FBI furnished Oppenheimer's political enemies with evidence that intimated communist ties. These enemies included Strauss, an AEC commissioner who had long harbored resentment against Oppenheimer both for his activity in opposing the hydrogen bomb and for his humiliation of Strauss before Congress some years earlier. Strauss had expressed opposition to exporting radioactive isotopes to other nations, and Oppenheimer had called them "less important than electronic devices but more important than, let us say, vitamins."[238]

On June 7, 1949, Oppenheimer testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee that he had associations with the Communist Party USA in the 1930s.[239] He testified that some of his students, including David Bohm, Giovanni Rossi Lomanitz, Philip Morrison, Bernard Peters, and Joseph Weinberg had been communists at the time they had worked with him at Berkeley. Frank Oppenheimer and his wife Jackie testified before HUAC that they had been members of the Communist Party USA. Frank was subsequently fired from his University of Minnesota position. Unable to find work in physics for many years, he became a cattle rancher in Colorado. He later taught high school physics and was the founder of the San Francisco Exploratorium.[72][240]

The triggering event for the security hearing happened on November 7, 1953,[241] when William Liscum Borden, who until earlier in the year had been the executive director of the United States Congress Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, sent Hoover a letter saying that "more probably than not J. Robert Oppenheimer is an agent of the Soviet Union."[242] Eisenhower never exactly believed the allegations in the letter but felt compelled to move forward with an investigation,[243] and on December 3, he ordered that a "blank wall" be placed between Oppenheimer and any government or military secrets.[244]

On December 21, 1953, Strauss told Oppenheimer that his security clearance had been suspended, pending resolution of a series of charges outlined in a letter, and discussed his resigning by way of requesting termination of his consulting contract with the AEC.[245] Oppenheimer chose not to resign and requested a hearing instead.[246] The charges were outlined in a letter from Kenneth D. Nichols, general manager of the AEC.[247][248] Nichols, who had thought highly of Oppenheimer's work on the earlier Long-Range Objectives Panel,[210] said that "in spite of [Oppenheimer's] record he is loyal to the United States."[249] He nonetheless drafted the letter, but later wrote that he was "not happy with the inclusion of a reference concerning Oppenheimer's opposition to the hydrogen bomb development."[250]

The hearing that followed in April–May 1954, which was held in secret, focused on Oppenheimer's past communist ties and his association during the Manhattan Project with suspected disloyal or communist scientists.[251] It then continued with an examination of Oppenheimer's opposition to the H-bomb and stances in subsequent projects and study groups.[252] A transcript of the hearings was published in June 1954,[253] with some redactions. In 2014, the U.S. Department of Energy made the full transcript public.[254][255]

Head and shoulders portrait.
Oppenheimer's former colleague, Edward Teller, testified against Oppenheimer at his security hearing in 1954.[256]

One of the key elements in this hearing was Oppenheimer's earliest testimony about George Eltenton's approach to various Los Alamos scientists, a story that Oppenheimer confessed he had fabricated to protect his friend Haakon Chevalier. Unknown to Oppenheimer, both versions were recorded during his interrogations of a decade before. He was surprised on the witness stand with transcripts of these, which he had not been given a chance to review. In fact, Oppenheimer had never told Chevalier that he had finally named him, and the testimony had cost Chevalier his job. Both Chevalier and Eltenton confirmed mentioning that they had a way to get information to the Soviets, Eltenton admitting he said this to Chevalier and Chevalier admitting he mentioned it to Oppenheimer, but both put the matter in terms of gossip and denied any thought or suggestion of treason or thoughts of espionage, either in planning or in deed. Neither was ever convicted of any crime.[257]

Teller testified that he considered Oppenheimer loyal to the U.S. government, but that:

In a great number of cases, I have seen Dr. Oppenheimer act—I understand that Dr. Oppenheimer acted—in a way which for me was exceedingly hard to understand. I thoroughly disagreed with him in numerous issues and his actions frankly appeared to me confused and complicated. To this extent I feel that I would like to see the vital interests of this country in hands which I understand better, and therefore trust more. In this very limited sense I would like to express a feeling that I would feel personally more secure if public matters would rest in other hands.[258]

Teller's testimony outraged the scientific community, and he was virtually ostracized from academic science.[259] Ernest Lawrence refused to testify, pleading an attack of ulcerative colitis, but an interview in which Lawrence condemned Oppenheimer was submitted in evidence.[260]

Many top scientists, as well as government and military figures, testified on Oppenheimer's behalf. Physicist Isidor Isaac Rabi said that the suspension of the security clearance was unnecessary: "he is a consultant, and if you don't want to consult the guy, you don't consult him, period."[261] But Groves testified that, under the stricter security criteria in effect in 1954, he "would not clear Dr. Oppenheimer today".[262]

At the conclusion of the hearings, the board revoked Oppenheimer's clearance by a 2–1 vote.[263] It unanimously cleared him of disloyalty, but a majority found that 20 of the 24 charges were either true or substantially true and that Oppenheimer would represent a security risk.[264] Then on June 29, 1954, the AEC upheld the findings of the Personnel Security Board, by a 4–1 decision, with Strauss writing the majority opinion.[265] In that opinion, he stressed Oppenheimer's "defects of character", "falsehoods, evasions and misrepresentations", and past associations with Communists and people close to Communists as the primary reasons for his determination. He did not comment on Oppenheimer's loyalty.[266]

During his hearing, Oppenheimer testified on the left-wing activities of ten of his colleagues and previous acquaintances, mostly in reference to activities in the late 1930s.[267] These ten people's activities were already public knowledge through prior hearings and activities (such as Addis, Chevelier, Lambert, May, Pitman, and I. Folkoff) or already known to the FBI.[268] Some believe that had his clearance not been stripped, he might have been remembered as someone who "named names" to save his own reputation,[269] but as it happened, most in the scientific community saw him as a martyr to McCarthyism, an eclectic liberal unjustly attacked by warmongering enemies, symbolic of the shift of scientific work from academia into the military.[270] Wernher von Braun told a Congressional committee: "In England, Oppenheimer would have been knighted."[271]

In a seminar at The Wilson Center in 2009, based on an extensive analysis of the Vassiliev notebooks taken from the KGB archives, John Earl Haynes, Harvey Klehr and Alexander Vassiliev confirmed that Oppenheimer never was involved in espionage for the Soviet Union, though Soviet intelligence tried repeatedly to recruit him. Further, he had several persons removed from the Manhattan Project who had sympathies to the Soviet Union.[272] For their part, Jerrold and Leona Schecter conclude that based on The Merkulov Letter, Oppenheimer must have been only a "facilitator", not a spy in the strict sense (although he would fall under that legal category in the U.S.).[273]

On December 16, 2022, United States Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm vacated the 1954 revocation of Oppenheimer's security clearance.[274] Her statement said, "In 1954, the Atomic Energy Commission revoked Dr. Oppenheimer's security clearance through a flawed process that violated the Commission's own regulations. As time has passed, more evidence has come to light of the bias and unfairness of the process that Dr. Oppenheimer was subjected to while the evidence of his loyalty and love of country have only been further affirmed."[275][274][276] Granholm's decision has drawn criticism.[277][278][279]

Final years

The frontiers of science are separated now by long years of study, by specialized vocabularies, arts, techniques, and knowledge from the common heritage even of a most civilized society; and anyone working at the frontier of such science is in that sense a very long way from home, a long way too from the practical arts that were its matrix and origin, as indeed they were of what we today call art.

Oppenheimer, "Prospects in the Arts and Sciences" in Man's Right to Knowledge[280]

Starting in 1954, Oppenheimer lived for several months of each year on the island of Saint John in the U.S. Virgin Islands. In 1957, he purchased a 2-acre (0.81 ha) tract of land on Gibney Beach, where he built a spartan home on the beach.[281] He spent considerable time sailing with his daughter Toni and wife Kitty.[282]

Oppenheimer's first public appearance following the stripping of his security clearance was a lecture titled "Prospects in the Arts and Sciences" for the Columbia University Bicentennial radio show Man's Right to Knowledge, in which he outlined his philosophy and his thoughts on the role of science in the modern world.[283][284] He had been selected for the final episode of the lecture series two years prior to the security hearing, though the university remained adamant that he stay on even after the controversy.[285]

In February 1955, the president of the University of Washington, Henry Schmitz, abruptly canceled an invitation to Oppenheimer to deliver a series of lectures there. Schmitz's decision caused an uproar among the students; 1,200 of them signed a petition protesting the decision, and Schmitz was burned in effigy. While they marched in protest, the state of Washington outlawed the Communist Party, and required all government employees to swear a loyalty oath. Edwin Albrecht Uehling, the chairman of the physics department and a colleague of Oppenheimer's from Berkeley, appealed to the university senate, and Schmitz's decision was overturned by a vote of 56 to 40. Oppenheimer stopped briefly in Seattle to change planes on a trip to Oregon and was joined for coffee during his layover by several University of Washington faculty, but Oppenheimer never lectured there.[286][287] Oppenheimer gave two lectures on the "Constitution of Matter" at Oregon State University during this trip.[288]

Oppenheimer was increasingly concerned about the danger that scientific inventions could pose to humanity. He joined with Albert Einstein, Bertrand Russell, Joseph Rotblat, and other eminent scientists and academics to establish what would eventually, in 1960, become the World Academy of Art and Science. Significantly, after his public humiliation, he did not sign the major open protests against nuclear weapons of the 1950s, including the Russell–Einstein Manifesto of 1955, nor, though invited, did he attend the first Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs in 1957.[289]

In his speeches and public writings, Oppenheimer continually stressed the difficulty of managing the power of knowledge in a world in which the freedom of science to exchange ideas was more and more hobbled by political concerns. Oppenheimer delivered the Reith Lectures on the BBC in 1953, which were subsequently published as Science and the Common Understanding.[290]

In 1955, Oppenheimer published The Open Mind, a collection of eight lectures that he had given since 1946 on the subject of nuclear weapons and popular culture.[291] Oppenheimer rejected the idea of nuclear gunboat diplomacy. "The purposes of this country in the field of foreign policy", he wrote, "cannot in any real or enduring way be achieved by coercion."[291]

In 1957, the philosophy and psychology departments at Harvard invited Oppenheimer to deliver the William James Lectures. An influential group of Harvard alumni led by Edwin Ginn that included Archibald Roosevelt protested the decision.[291] 1,200 people attended Oppenheimer's six lectures, "The Hope of Order", in Sanders Theatre.[289] In 1962, Oppenheimer delivered the Whidden Lectures at McMaster University, which were published in 1964 as The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists.[292]

Oppenheimer stands behind a large bust and gives a speech
In April 1958, Oppenheimer spoke at the inauguration of the Nuclear Physics Institute in the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. The bust is of Niels Bohr.

Deprived of political influence, Oppenheimer continued to lecture, write, and work on physics. He toured Europe and Japan, giving talks about the history of science, the role of science in society, and the nature of the universe.[293] Oppenheimer was warmly received during his three-week lecture tour in Japan in 1960, just 15 years after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.[294] He indicated interest in seeing Hiroshima, but the Japan Committee for Intellectual Interchange, which sponsored the tour, decided it would be best not to stop at Hiroshima or Nagasaki, and Oppenheimer never went to either city.[295] In 1963 he spoke about the importance of studying the history of science at the dedication of the Niels Bohr Library and Archives of the American Institute of Physics.[296][297]

Oppenheimer continued to visit academic institutions throughout his final years. He remained a controversial figure to students, faculty, and communities. In November 1955, Oppenheimer became the inaugural week-long visiting fellow at the Phillips Exeter Academy in Exeter, New Hampshire.[298]

In September 1957, France made Oppenheimer an Officer of the Legion of Honor,[299] and on May 3, 1962, he was elected a Foreign Member of the Royal Society in Britain.[300][301]

Enrico Fermi Award

In 1959, then-Senator John F. Kennedy voted to deny Lewis Strauss, Oppenheimer's greatest detractor in his security hearings, confirmation as Secretary of Commerce, effectively ending Strauss's political career. In 1962, Kennedy―now President of the United States―invited Oppenheimer to a ceremony honoring 49 Nobel Prize winners. At the event, AEC chairman Glenn Seaborg asked Oppenheimer whether he wanted another security hearing. Oppenheimer declined.[302]

In March 1963, the General Advisory committee of the AEC selected Oppenheimer to receive its Enrico Fermi Award, an award Congress had created in 1954.[302] Kennedy was assassinated before he could present the award to Oppenheimer, but his successor, Lyndon Johnson, did so in a December 1963 ceremony at which he cited Oppenheimer's "contributions to theoretical physics as a teacher and originator of ideas, [and] leadership of the Los Alamos Laboratory and the atomic energy program during critical years."[303] He called the signing of the award one of Kennedy's greatest acts as president.[304] Oppenheimer told Johnson, "I think it is just possible, Mr. President, that it has taken some charity and some courage for you to make this award today."[304][305]

Kennedy's widow, Jackie, made a point of attending the ceremony so she could tell Oppenheimer how much her husband had wanted him to have the medal.[303] Also present were Teller, who had recommended Oppenheimer receive the award in hopes that it would heal the rift between them,[306] and Henry D. Smyth, who in 1954 had been the lone dissenter from the AEC's 4–1 decision to define Oppenheimer as a security risk.

But congressional hostility to Oppenheimer lingered. Senator Bourke B. Hickenlooper formally protested Oppenheimer's selection just eight days after Kennedy was killed,[302] and several Republican members of the House AEC Committee boycotted the ceremony.[307]

The rehabilitation represented by the award was symbolic, as Oppenheimer still lacked a security clearance and could have no effect on official policy, but the award came with a $50,000 tax-free stipend.[304]


A chain smoker (of Chesterfields),[308] Oppenheimer was diagnosed with throat cancer in late 1965. After inconclusive surgery, he underwent unsuccessful radiation treatment and chemotherapy late in 1966. On February 18, 1967, he died in his sleep at his home in Princeton, aged 62 years.[182] A memorial service was held a week later at Alexander Hall on the campus of Princeton University.[309] The service was attended by 600 of his scientific, political, and military associates, including Bethe, Groves, Kennan, Lilienthal, Rabi, Smyth, and Wigner. His brother Frank and the rest of his family were there, as was the historian Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., the novelist John O'Hara, and George Balanchine, the director of the New York City Ballet. Bethe, Kennan and Smyth gave brief eulogies.[310] Oppenheimer's body was cremated and his ashes placed in an urn, which Kitty dropped into the sea within sight of the St. John beach house.[311]

In October 1972, Kitty died aged 62 from an intestinal infection complicated by a pulmonary embolism.[312] Oppenheimer's ranch in New Mexico was then inherited by their son Peter, and the beach property was inherited by their daughter Katherine "Toni" Oppenheimer Silber. Toni was refused security clearance for her chosen vocation as a United Nations translator after the FBI brought up the old charges against her father. In January 1977, three months after her second marriage ended, she hanged herself in the family beach house.[313] She left the property to "the people of St. John for a public park and recreation area."[314] The house was built too close to the coast and was destroyed by a hurricane. As of 2007[update], the Virgin Islands Government maintained a Community Center nearby.[315]


A group of men in uniforms, suits and academic dress sit for a formal group photograph
Recipients of Harvard honorary degrees, June 5, 1947. Front row from left: Oppenheimer; Ernest Cadman Colwell; General George C. Marshall, Harvard President James B. Conant; General Omar N. Bradley; T. S. Eliot.

When Oppenheimer was stripped of his political influence in 1954, he symbolized for many the folly of scientists who believed they could control the use of their research, and the dilemmas of moral responsibility presented by science in the nuclear age.[316] The hearings were motivated by politics and personal enmities, and reflected a stark divide in the nuclear weapons community.[317] One group passionately feared the Soviet Union as a mortal enemy, and believed having the most powerful weaponry capable of providing the most massive retaliation was the best strategy to combat that threat. The other group thought developing the H-bomb would not improve Western security and that using the weapon against large civilian populations would be genocide; they advocated instead a more flexible response to the Soviets involving tactical nuclear weapons, strengthened conventional forces, and arms control agreements. The first of these groups was the more powerful in political terms, and Oppenheimer became its target.[318][319]

Rather than consistently oppose the "Red-baiting" of the late 1940s and early 1950s, Oppenheimer testified against former colleagues and students, before and during his hearing. In one incident, his damning testimony against former student Bernard Peters was selectively leaked to the press. Historians have interpreted this as an attempt by Oppenheimer to please his colleagues in the government and perhaps to divert attention from his own previous left-wing ties and those of his brother. In the end, it became a liability when it became clear Oppenheimer had really doubted Peters's loyalty, and recommending him for the Manhattan Project was reckless, or at least contradictory.[320]

Popular depictions of Oppenheimer view his security struggles as a confrontation between right-wing militarists (represented by Teller) and left-wing intellectuals (represented by Oppenheimer) over the moral question of weapons of mass destruction.[321] Biographers and historians have often viewed Oppenheimer's story as a tragedy.[322][323][324] National security advisor and academic McGeorge Bundy, who worked with Oppenheimer on the State Department Panel of Consultants, wrote: "Quite aside from Oppenheimer's extraordinary rise and fall in prestige and power, his character has fully tragic dimensions in its combination of charm and arrogance, intelligence and blindness, awareness and insensitivity, and perhaps above all daring and fatalism. All these, in different ways, were turned against him in the hearings."[324]

The question of scientists' responsibility toward humanity inspired Bertolt Brecht's drama Life of Galileo (1955), left its imprint on Friedrich Dürrenmatt's The Physicists, and is the basis of John Adams's 2005 opera Doctor Atomic, which was commissioned to portray Oppenheimer as a modern-day Faust. Heinar Kipphardt's play In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer, after appearing on West German television, had its theatrical release in Berlin and Munich in October 1964. The 1967 Finnish television film Oppenheimerin tapaus (The Case of Oppenheimer) is based on the same play and produced by the Yleisradio company.[325][326] Oppenheimer's objections resulted in an exchange of correspondence with Kipphardt, in which Kipphardt offered to make corrections but defended the play.[327] It premiered in New York in 1968, with Joseph Wiseman as Oppenheimer. New York Times theater critic Clive Barnes called it an "angry play and a partisan play" that sided with Oppenheimer but portrayed him as a "tragic fool and genius."[328] Oppenheimer had difficulty with this portrayal. After reading a transcript of Kipphardt's play soon after it began to be performed, Oppenheimer threatened to sue Kipphardt, decrying "improvisations which were contrary to history and to the nature of the people involved."[329] Later Oppenheimer told an interviewer:

The whole damn thing [his security hearing] was a farce, and these people are trying to make a tragedy out of it. ... I had never said that I had regretted participating in a responsible way in the making of the bomb. I said that perhaps he [Kipphardt] had forgotten Guernica, Coventry, Hamburg, Dresden, Dachau, Warsaw, and Tokyo; but I had not, and that if he found it so difficult to understand, he should write a play about something else.[330]

External videos
video icon Presentation by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin on American Prometheus, September 30, 2006, C-SPAN

Oppenheimer is the subject of many biographies, including American Prometheus (2005) by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin, which won the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for Biography or Autobiography.[331] The 1980 BBC TV serial Oppenheimer, starring Sam Waterston, won three BAFTA Television Awards.[332] The Day After Trinity, a 1980 documentary about Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb, was nominated for an Academy Award and received a Peabody Award.[333][334] Oppenheimer's life is explored in Tom Morton-Smith's 2015 play Oppenheimer,[335] and the 1989 film Fat Man and Little Boy, where he was portrayed by Dwight Schultz.[336] Also in 1989, David Strathairn played Oppenheimer in the TV film Day One.[337] In the 2023 American film Oppenheimer, directed by Christopher Nolan and based on American Prometheus, Oppenheimer is portrayed by Cillian Murphy.[338] The film won the Academy Award for best picture, and Murphy won for best actor.[339]

A centennial conference about Oppenheimer's legacy was held in 2004 at the University of California, Berkeley, alongside a digital exhibition on his life,[340] with the conference proceedings published in 2005 as Reappraising Oppenheimer: Centennial Studies and Reflections.[341] His papers are in the Library of Congress.[342]

As a scientist, Oppenheimer was remembered by his students and colleagues as a brilliant researcher and engaging teacher who founded modern theoretical physics in the United States. "More than any other man", Bethe wrote, "he was responsible for raising American theoretical physics from a provincial adjunct of Europe to world leadership."[343] Because his scientific attentions often changed rapidly, he never worked long enough on any one topic and carried it to fruition to merit the Nobel Prize,[344] though his investigations contributing to the theory of black holes might have warranted the prize had he lived long enough to see them brought to fruition by later astrophysicists.[112] An asteroid, 67085 Oppenheimer, was named in his honor on January 4, 2000,[345] as was the lunar crater Oppenheimer in 1970.[346]

As a military and public policy advisor, Oppenheimer was a leader in the shift toward technocracy in the interactions between science and the military, and in the emergence of "big science". During World War II, scientists became involved in military research to an unprecedented degree. Because of the threat fascism posed to Western civilization, they volunteered in great numbers for technological, and organizational, assistance to the Allied effort, resulting in powerful tools such as radar, the proximity fuze and operations research. As a cultured, intellectual, theoretical physicist who became a disciplined military organizer, Oppenheimer represented the shift away from the idea that scientists had their "heads in the clouds" and that knowledge of esoteric subjects like the composition of the atomic nucleus had no "real-world" applications.[316]

Two days before the Trinity test, Oppenheimer expressed his hopes and fears in a quotation from Bhartṛhari's Śatakatraya:

In battle, in the forest, at the precipice in the mountains,
On the dark great sea, in the midst of javelins and arrows,
In sleep, in confusion, in the depths of shame,
The good deeds a man has done before defend him.[347][348]


  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert (1954). Science and the Common Understanding. New York: Simon and Schuster. OCLC 34304713.
  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert (1955). The Open Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster. OCLC 297109.
  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert (1964). The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists. London: Oxford University Press. OCLC 592102.
  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert; Rabi, I.I (1969). Oppenheimer. New York: Scribner. OCLC 2729. (posthumous)
  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert; Smith, Alice Kimball; Weiner, Charles (1980). Robert Oppenheimer, Letters and Recollections. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-77605-0. OCLC 5946652. (posthumous)
  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert; Metropolis, N.; Rota, Gian-Carlo; Sharp, D. H. (1984). Uncommon Sense. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Birkhäuser Boston. ISBN 978-0-8176-3165-9. OCLC 10458715. (posthumous)
  • Oppenheimer, J. Robert (1989). Atom and Void: Essays on Science and Community. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08547-0. OCLC 19981106. (posthumous)
  • Bird, Kai (2005). American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. Alfred A. Knopf / Penguin Random House. ISBN 978-1-83895-970-8.
For list of Oppenheimer biographies see American Prometheus#Other Oppenheimer biographies


  1. ^ Oppenheimer's birth certificate reads "Julius Robert Oppenheimer,"[1][2] and his college transcript "J Robert Oppenheimer."[3] Oppenheimer himself said the J stood for nothing, and his brother Frank "surmised that the J was symbolic, a gesture in the direction of naming the eldest son after the father but at the same time a signal that his parents did not want Robert to be a 'junior.'"[4]
  2. ^ Oppenheimer already had three PhD students who had commenced under another supervisor: Harvey Hall and J. Franklin Carlson under William Howell Williams; and Leo Nedelsky, who had started under Samuel K. Allison. In 1931, Hall became the first of Oppenheimer's students to complete his PhD.[54]
  3. ^ Oppenheimer's other doctoral students: Arnold Nordsieck, Glen Camp, Willis Lamb, Samuel Batdorf, Sydney Dancroft, George Volkoff, Philip Morrison, Hartland Snyder, Joseph Keller, Robert Christy, Eugene Cooper, Shichi Kusaka, Richard Dempster, Roy Thomas, Eldred Nelson, Bernard Peters, Edward Gerjuoy, Stanley Frankel, Chaim Richman, Joseph Weinberg, David Bohm, Leslie Foldy, Harold Lewis and Siegfried Wouthuysen.[56]
  4. ^ He also spoke Dutch, German, French and some Chinese.[99]
  5. ^ "If the radiance ..." is Bhagavad Gita verse XI,12 (divi sūryasahasrasya bhavedyugapadutthitā / yadi bhāḥ sadṛṥī sā syādbhāsastasya mahātmanaḥ);[156][157] "Now I am become Death ..." is verse XI,32.(kālo'smi lokakṣayakṛtpravṛddho lokānsamāhartumiha pravṛttaḥ) Oppenheimer had read the Bhagavad Gita in the original Sanskrit, and the translation is his own.[158][159] In the literature, "shatterer" is usually given rather than "destroyer," because "shatterer" appears in the first printed rendition of Oppenheimer's anecdote (in Time magazine, November 8, 1948).[31] The "shatterer" version later appeared in Robert Jungk's Brighter than a Thousand Suns: A Personal History of the Atomic Scientists (1958),[160] which was based on an interview with Oppenheimer.[161]
  6. ^ Due to the subsequent development of the Standard Model, the muon is now considered to be a lepton and not a meson.[181]


  1. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 2.
  2. ^ Pais 2006, p. 355 (end plates)
  3. ^ Smith & Weiner 1980, p. 337.
  4. ^ Smith & Weiner 1980, p. 1
  5. ^ Schweber 2008, p. 283
  6. ^ a b Cassidy 2005, pp. 5–11
  7. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 16, 145, 282
  8. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 10
  9. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 12
  10. ^ a b Cassidy 2005, p. 35
  11. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 23, 29
  12. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 16–17
  13. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 43–46
  14. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 61–63
  15. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 75–76, 88–89
  16. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 90–92
  17. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 94
  18. ^ Monk 2012, p. 92.
  19. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 46.
  20. ^ Monk 2012, p. 97.
  21. ^ McCluskey, Megan (July 25, 2023). "J. Robert Oppenheimer's Grandson on What the Movie Gets Right and the One Scene He Would Have Changed". Time. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  22. ^ "Oppenheimer and the poisoned apple". Cambridge University Library Special Collections. August 15, 2023. Retrieved December 9, 2023.
  23. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 39–40, 96, 258
  24. ^ Smith & Weiner 1980, p. 91
  25. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 35–36, 43–47, 51–52, 320, 353
  26. ^ Smith & Weiner 1980, p. 135
  27. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 108
  28. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 60
  29. ^ Oppenheimer, Julius Robert (1927). Zur Quantentheorie kontinuierlicher Spektren (PhD thesis). OCLC 71902137.
  30. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 109
  31. ^ a b "The Eternal Apprentice". Time. November 8, 1948. Archived from the original on October 7, 2013. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  32. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 112
  33. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 115–116
  34. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 142
  35. ^ a b Cassidy 2005, pp. 151–152
  36. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 73–74
  37. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 84
  38. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 75–76
  39. ^ "The Early Years". University of California, Berkeley. 2004. Archived from the original on October 15, 2007. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  40. ^ Conant 2005, p. 75
  41. ^ Herken 2002, pp. 14–15
  42. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 96–97
  43. ^ Bethe 1968a; reprinted as Bethe 1997, p. 184
  44. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 91
  45. ^ Conant 2005, p. 141
  46. ^ a b Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 104–107
  47. ^ a b c Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 88
  48. ^ Bethe 1968a; reprinted as Bethe 1997, p. 178
  49. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R. (1930). "On the Theory of Electrons and Protons" (PDF). Physical Review (Submitted manuscript). 35 (1): 562–563. Bibcode:1930PhRv...35..562O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.35.562. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 24, 2018. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  50. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R. (January 1, 1928). "Three Notes on the Quantum Theory of Aperiodic Effects". Physical Review. 31 (1): 66–81. Bibcode:1928PhRv...31...66O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.31.66.
  51. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R. (1928). "On the Quantum Theory of the Autoelectric Field Currents". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 14 (5): 363–365. Bibcode:1928PNAS...14..363O. doi:10.1073/pnas.14.5.363. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1085522. PMID 16577110.
  52. ^ Merzbacher, Eugen (August 1, 2002). "The Early History of Quantum Tunneling". Physics Today. 55 (8): 44–49. Bibcode:2002PhT....55h..44M. doi:10.1063/1.1510281. ISSN 0031-9228.
  53. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R.; Hall, Harvey (1931). "Relativistic Theory of the Photoelectric Effect". Physical Review. 38 (1): 57–79. Bibcode:1931PhRv...38...57H. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.38.57.
  54. ^ Monk 2012, pp. 174–175.
  55. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 173
  56. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 358–362.
  57. ^ Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). "The quantum theory of the electron". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. 117 (778): 610–624. Bibcode:1928RSPSA.117..610D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023. ISSN 1364-5021. JSTOR 94981.
  58. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 162–163
  59. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R.; Serber, Robert (1938). "On the Stability of Stellar Neutron Cores". Physical Review. 54 (7): 540. Bibcode:1938PhRv...54..540O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.540.
  60. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R.; Volkoff, G.M. (1939). "On Massive Neutron Cores" (PDF). Physical Review. 55 (4): 374–381. Bibcode:1939PhRv...55..374O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.374. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2014.
  61. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R.; Snyder, H. (1939). "On Continued Gravitational Contraction". Physical Review. 56 (5): 455–459. Bibcode:1939PhRv...56..455O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.455.
  62. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 89–90
  63. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 375
  64. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 98
  65. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 128
  66. ^ Herken 2002, p. 12
  67. ^ Childs 1968, p. 145
  68. ^ a b c Cassidy 2005, pp. 184–186
  69. ^ "The Brothers". Time. June 27, 1949. Archived from the original on November 21, 2007. Retrieved May 22, 2008.
  70. ^ "FBI file: Katherine Oppenheimer" (PDF). Federal Bureau of Investigation. May 23, 1944. p. 2. Archived from the original on May 25, 2013. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
  71. ^ "A Life". University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original on November 27, 2007. Retrieved May 22, 2008.
  72. ^ a b Haynes 2006, p. 147
  73. ^ Haynes, Klehr & Vassiliev 2009, p. 58.
  74. ^ "Chevalier to Oppenheimer, July 23, 1964". Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller. Archived from the original on August 12, 2011. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  75. ^ "Excerpts from Barbara Chevalier's unpublished manuscript". Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller. Archived from the original on August 12, 2011. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  76. ^ "Excerpts from Gordon Griffith's unpublished memoir". Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller. Archived from the original on August 21, 2011. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  77. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 137–138
  78. ^ Teukolsky, Rachel (Spring 2001). "Regarding Scientist X" (PDF). Berkeley Science Review. No. 1. p. 17. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 1, 2006.
  79. ^ United States Atomic Energy Commission 1954, p. 9
  80. ^ Oppenheimer, J. R. (March 4, 1954). "Oppenheimer's Letter of Response on Letter Regarding the Oppenheimer Affair". Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. Archived from the original on May 14, 2008. Retrieved May 22, 2008.
  81. ^ Strout 1963, p. 4
  82. ^ Scott-Smith, Giles (2002). "The Congress for Cultural Freedom, the End of Ideology and the 1955 Milan Conference: 'Defining the Parameters of Discourse'". Journal of Contemporary History. 37 (3): 437–455. doi:10.1177/00220094020370030601. ISSN 0022-0094. JSTOR 3180790. S2CID 153804847.
  83. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 199–200
  84. ^ Monk 2012, p. 244.
  85. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 111–113
  86. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 153–160
  87. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 160–162
  88. ^ Streshinsky & Klaus 2013, pp. 111–119
  89. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 186–187
  90. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 231–233
  91. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 232–234, 511–513
  92. ^ Herken 2002, pp. 101–102
  93. ^ a b Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 249–254
  94. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 363–365
  95. ^ Streshinsky & Klaus 2013, pp. 290–292
  96. ^ Pais 2006, p. 17–18.
  97. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 99,102.
  98. ^ Schweber 2006, p. 543.
  99. ^ Hunner 2012, p. 17.
  100. ^ "The TIME Vault: November 8, 1948". Time. November 8, 1948. p. 75. Archived from the original on May 1, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  101. ^ a b Roy 2018, p. 157.
  102. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 99,102
  103. ^ Hijiya 2000, p. 133
  104. ^ Schweber 2006, p. 544.
  105. ^ Boyce 2015, p. 595.
  106. ^ a b Roy 2018, p. 158.
  107. ^ Hijiya 2000, p. 126.
  108. ^ Scott et al. 1994, p. 60.
  109. ^ Hart 2008, p. 121.
  110. ^ Pais 2006, p. 143.
  111. ^ Rabi, Oppenheimer (1969), p. 7, cited in Rhodes 1977, p. 149, Hijiya 2000, p. 166 and Pais 2006, p. 143
  112. ^ a b Kelly 2006, p. 128
  113. ^ Feldman 2000, pp. 196–198
  114. ^ Hart 2008, p. 119.
  115. ^ Hufbauer 2005, pp. 31–47
  116. ^ a b Pais 2006, p. 33
  117. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 178
  118. ^ "Nomination Archive – Robert J. Oppenheimer". Nobel Media AB. April 2020. Archived from the original on July 17, 2020. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  119. ^ "J. Robert Oppenheimer's Interview". Atomic Heritage Foundation - Nuclear Museum. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
  120. ^ Hewlett & Anderson 1962, pp. 44–46.
  121. ^ Norris 2002, p. 240.
  122. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, pp. 42–44.
  123. ^ Hewlett & Anderson 1962, pp. 72–74
  124. ^ Hewlett & Anderson 1962, pp. 81–82
  125. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, pp. 57–58.
  126. ^ Norris 2002, p. 244.
  127. ^ Groves 1962, pp. 61–63.
  128. ^ a b Norris 2002, p. 242.
  129. ^ Groves 1962, p. 63
  130. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 185–187.
  131. ^ Groves 1962, pp. 66–67.
  132. ^ Smith & Weiner 1980, p. 227.
  133. ^ a b Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 210
  134. ^ Hewlett & Anderson 1962, pp. 230–232
  135. ^ Bethe 1968a; reprinted as Bethe 1997, p. 190
  136. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 221–222
  137. ^ Rhodes 1986, pp. 511–512.
  138. ^ Rhodes 1986, pp. 510–511.
  139. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, pp. 226–229
  140. ^ Hewlett & Anderson 1962, pp. 312–313
  141. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, pp. 245–248
  142. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, pp. 248–249
  143. ^ "Nuclear Files: Library: Biographies: Robert Christy". Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. Archived from the original on May 22, 2006. Retrieved March 8, 2011.
  144. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 312
  145. ^ Jones 1985, pp. 530–532
  146. ^ Rhodes 1986, pp. 642–643
  147. ^ Jungk 1958, p. 201.
  148. ^ Herken 2002, pp. 128–129.
  149. ^ Streshinsky & Klaus 2013, pp. 194, 211.
  150. ^ Szasz 1984, p. 88
  151. ^ Bernstein, Jeremy (April 26, 2018). "Letters : Bomb in the Head". London Review of Books. 40 (8). ISSN 0260-9592. Archived from the original on July 15, 2023. Retrieved January 10, 2022.
  152. ^ Johnson, Mark (July 22, 2023). "How Oppenheimer weighed the odds of an atomic bomb test ending Earth". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 22, 2023. Retrieved July 22, 2023.
  153. ^ "Science: Atomic Footprint". Time. September 17, 1945. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  154. ^ Barnett, Lincoln (October 10, 1949). "J. Robert Oppenheimer". Life. p. 133. Archived from the original on August 9, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
  155. ^ Oppenheimer, J.R. (1965). 'Now I am become death...' (video). Atomic Archive. Archived from the original on May 16, 2008. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  156. ^ "Bhagavad Gita XI.12". Gita Supersite by Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. September 2, 2017. Archived from the original on August 4, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  157. ^ "Chapter 11. The Universal Form, text 12". Bhagavad As It Is. Archived from the original on August 4, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
  158. ^ Hijiya 2000
  159. ^ "Chapter 11. The Universal Form, text 32". Bhagavad As It Is. Archived from the original on November 17, 2012. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
  160. ^ Jungk 1958, p. 201
  161. ^ Hijiya 2000, pp. 123–124
  162. ^ Monk 2012, pp. 456–457.
  163. ^ "Debate over how to use the bomb". The Manhattan Project. U.S. Department of Energy History Office. Archived from the original on September 2, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2023.
  164. ^ Monk 2012, pp. 467–468.
  165. ^ Monk 2012, p. 476.
  166. ^ Monk 2012, pp. 493–494.
  167. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 331–332.
  168. ^ Bella, Timothy (July 21, 2023). "The atomic bombings left Oppenheimer shattered: 'I have blood on my hands'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 18, 2023.
  169. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 3, 323, 352, 391, 547.
  170. ^ Kelly 2006, pp. 41, 154.
  171. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 253
  172. ^ "TIME Magazine Cover: Dr. Robert Oppenheimer". Time. November 8, 1948. Archived from the original on November 22, 2008. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  173. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 344–347
  174. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 333–335
  175. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 351
  176. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 360–365
  177. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 369
  178. ^ "Oppenheimer, J. Robert, 1904–1967". Archives Directory for the History of Collecting. Archived from the original on April 5, 2016. Retrieved August 24, 2019.
  179. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 371–377
  180. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 269–272
  181. ^ Spangenburg & Moser 2004, pp. 41–44
  182. ^ a b "J. Robert Oppenheimer, Atom Bomb Pioneer, Dies". The New York Times. February 19, 1967. pp. 1, 66. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023 – via TimesMachine.
  183. ^ "J. Robert Oppenheimer – Past Director". Institute for Advanced Study. December 9, 2019. Archived from the original on May 3, 2017. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  184. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 347–349
  185. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 353
  186. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 264–267
  187. ^ Hewlett & Duncan 1969, pp. 380–385
  188. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 1–2
  189. ^ Hewlett & Anderson 1962, pp. 104, 240
  190. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 418
  191. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, p. 36
  192. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 293–295
  193. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, p. 46
  194. ^ Rhodes 1995, pp. 399–400
  195. ^ Hewlett & Duncan 1969, p. 384
  196. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, p. 10
  197. ^ Pais 2006, p. 172
  198. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 423–424
  199. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 62–64
  200. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 429
  201. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 300
  202. ^ Hewlett & Duncan 1969, pp. 535–537
  203. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 443
  204. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 85, 92, 160–161, 164
  205. ^ Polenberg 2002, pp. 110–111
  206. ^ Rhodes 1995, p. 496
  207. ^ Rhodes 1995, pp. 496–497
  208. ^ McMillan 2005, pp. 145–149
  209. ^ Hewlett & Holl 1989, pp. 47–48
  210. ^ a b Nichols 1987, p. 264
  211. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 90, 102
  212. ^ a b c d Pais 2006, p. 189
  213. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 450
  214. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 125–126
  215. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 445–446
  216. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 126–127
  217. ^ Grant, Clement L. (August 1957). "Air Defense of North America". Air Force Magazine. p. 257. Archived from the original on July 16, 2020. Retrieved July 14, 2020.
  218. ^ Pais 2006, pp. 126–128
  219. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, p. 68
  220. ^ McMillan 2005, p. 4
  221. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 118–119
  222. ^ McMillan 2005, pp. 152–153
  223. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, p. 121
  224. ^ McMillan 2005, p. 154
  225. ^ a b Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 92–93
  226. ^ McMillan 2005, pp. 140–141
  227. ^ a b Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 451
  228. ^ Bundy 1988, p. 289
  229. ^ Pais 2006, pp. 194–195
  230. ^ Rhodes 1995, p. 528
  231. ^ Oppenheimer, J Robert (July 1953). "Atomic Weapons and American Policy". Foreign Affairs. 31 (July 1953). Council on Foreign Relations: 525–535. doi:10.2307/20030987. JSTOR 20030987. Archived from the original on August 5, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  232. ^ Pais 2006, pp. 195
  233. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 124, 127
  234. ^ Bundy 1988, pp. 307–308
  235. ^ J Robert Oppenheimer FBI security file [microform]: Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, 1978
  236. ^ Stern 1969, p. 2
  237. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 195–201
  238. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 286
  239. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 394–396
  240. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 282–284
  241. ^ Stern 1969, p. 1
  242. ^ Rhodes 1995, pp. 532–533
  243. ^ Bundy 1988, p. 305
  244. ^ Rhodes 1995, pp. 534–535
  245. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 481–484
  246. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 484
  247. ^ Stern 1969, pp. 229–230
  248. ^ United States Atomic Energy Commission 1954, pp. 3–7
  249. ^ Nichols 1987, p. 305
  250. ^ Nichols 1987, p. 307
  251. ^ Rhodes 1995, pp. 543–549
  252. ^ Rhodes 1995, pp. 550–556
  253. ^ Rhodes 1995, p. 557
  254. ^ Broad, William J. (October 11, 2014). "Transcripts Kept Secret for 60 Years Bolster Defense of Oppenheimer's Loyalty". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 18, 2015. Retrieved January 17, 2015.
  255. ^ Department of Energy. "J. Robert Oppenheimer Personnel Hearings Transcripts". Department of Energy (DOE) OpenNet documents. Archived from the original on January 18, 2015. Retrieved January 17, 2015.
  256. ^ Stern 1969, p. 335.
  257. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 313–319
  258. ^ "Race for the Superbomb: Edward Teller's Testimony in the Oppenheimer Hearings". American Experience. PBS. Archived from the original on July 23, 2023. Retrieved July 23, 2023.
  259. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 532–534
  260. ^ Emilie, Haertsch (2016). "Large and in charge". Distillations. Vol. 2, no. 3. pp. 40–43. Archived from the original on March 23, 2018. Retrieved March 22, 2018.
  261. ^ "Testimony in the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer". Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. Archived from the original on January 15, 2006. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  262. ^ Stern 1969, p. 288
  263. ^ Hewlett and Holl, Atoms for Peace and War, p. 98.
  264. ^ Stern 1969, pp. 376, 380–381
  265. ^ Stern 1969, pp. 412–413
  266. ^ Stern 1969, pp. 413, 415–418
  267. ^ United States Atomic Energy Commission 1954, pp. 145–185
  268. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 513
  269. ^ Polenberg 2005, pp. 267–268
  270. ^ Polenberg 2005, pp. 268–272
  271. ^ Bethe 1968b, p. 27
  272. ^ Haynes 2006, pp. 133–144
  273. ^ Schecter, J; Schecter, L; Herken, G; Peake, H. "Was Oppenheimer a Soviet Spy? A Roundtable Discussion". CWIHP e-Dossier Series. Wilson Center. Retrieved November 24, 2023.
  274. ^ a b Broad, William J. (December 16, 2022). "J. Robert Oppenheimer Cleared of 'Black Mark' After 68 Years". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 7, 2023. Retrieved December 17, 2022.
  275. ^ Staff (December 16, 2022). "Secretary Granholm Statement on DOE Order Vacating 1954 Atomic Energy Commission Decision In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer". United States Department of Energy. Archived from the original on August 9, 2023. Retrieved December 17, 2022.
  276. ^ Oladipo, Gloria (December 17, 2022). "US voids 1954 revoking of J Robert Oppenheimer's security clearance". The Guardian. Archived from the original on July 29, 2023. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  277. ^ Bernstein, Barton J. (July 11, 2023). "Christopher Nolan's Forthcoming 'Oppenheimer' Movie: A Historian's Questions, Worries, and Challenges". Washington Decoded. Archived from the original on August 19, 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023.
  278. ^ Bernstein, Barton J. (February 6, 2023). "Oppenheimer's 'Hollywood Ending'". The New York Sun. Archived from the original on August 19, 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023.
  279. ^ Flynn, Daniel J. (December 20, 2022). "The Undeserved Rehabilitation of J. Robert Oppenheimer". The American Spectator. Archived from the original on August 19, 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023.
  280. ^ "Text of Oppenheimer Lecture Ending the Columbia Bicentenary". The New York Times. December 27, 1954. Archived from the original on March 27, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
  281. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 566–569
  282. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 573
  283. ^ "1954: Nuclear Scientist Speaks". The New York Times. December 27, 2004. Archived from the original on July 18, 2022. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  284. ^ Pais 2006, p. 291
  285. ^ "Oppenheimer Sets Path for Mankind". The New York Times. December 27, 1954. Archived from the original on April 2, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2022.
  286. ^ Sanders 1979, pp. 8–19.
  287. ^ Wolverton 2008, pp. 57–61.
  288. ^ Library of Congress. "Condon lecture at Oregon State College". researchworks.oclc.org. Washington, D.C. : Library of Congress. Retrieved January 24, 2024.
  289. ^ a b Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 559–561
  290. ^ "J. Robert Oppenheimer". Institute for Advanced Study. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
  291. ^ a b c Wolverton 2008, pp. 84–87
  292. ^ Wolverton 2008, pp. 227–228
  293. ^ Wolverton 2008, pp. 174–180
  294. ^ Wolverton 2008, pp. 177–182
  295. ^ Laird, Ian (Summer 2023). "Oppenheimer's visit to Japan". National Security Science. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Retrieved June 23, 2024.
  296. ^ Holland, Sam (February 26, 2021). "In the Sky with Diamonds: Physics in the 1960s". American Institute of Physics. Archived from the original on August 4, 2023. Retrieved July 9, 2023.
  297. ^ Niels Bohr Library Dedication Ceremony, American Institute of Physics, September 26, 1962 on YouTube
  298. ^ "The visiting fireman". Phillips Exeter Academy. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
  299. ^ Wolverton 2008, pp. 105–106
  300. ^ Bethe, H. A. (1968a). "J. Robert Oppenheimer. 1904–1967". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 14: 390–416. doi:10.1098/rsbm.1968.0016. ISSN 0080-4606. reprinted as Bethe, Hans (1997). "J. Robert Oppenheimer 1904–1967". Biographical Memoirs. 71: 175–218. Archived from the original on October 10, 2011. Retrieved March 5, 2011.
  301. ^ "List of Fellows of the Royal Society" (PDF). Royal Society. Archived from the original on November 30, 2010. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  302. ^ a b c "Johnson Awards AEC's Fermi Award to Oppenheimer, Once Branded Risk". The New York Times. United Press International. November 29, 1963. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved August 18, 2023 – via TimesMachine.
  303. ^ a b Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 574–575
  304. ^ a b c Finney, John W. (December 2, 1963). "Oppenheimer Gets Praise of Johnson with Fermi Prize". The New York Times. pp. 1, 22. Archived from the original on August 18, 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023.
  305. ^ "Tales of the Bomb". Time. October 4, 1968. Archived from the original on January 14, 2009. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  306. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 348–349
  307. ^ Johnson, Lyndon B. (December 2, 1963). "Remarks Upon Presenting the Fermi Award to Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara. Archived from the original on August 20, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  308. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 96.
  309. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 585–588
  310. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 351–352
  311. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, p. 588
  312. ^ "Mrs. J. Robert Oppenheimer, 62, Nuclear Physicist's Widow, Dies". The New York Times. Reuters. October 28, 1972. Archived from the original on July 30, 2023. Retrieved August 18, 2023.
  313. ^ Elliott, Jaime (July 1, 2014). "Oppenheimer's Legacy on St. John". Old Town Crier. Archived from the original on January 10, 2018. Retrieved January 11, 2018.
  314. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 590–591
  315. ^ "Gibney Beach". St. John's Beach Guide. Archived from the original on October 13, 2007. Retrieved May 22, 2008.
  316. ^ a b Thorpe, Charles (2002). "Disciplining Experts: Scientific Authority and Liberal Democracy in the Oppenheimer Case". Social Studies of Science. 32 (4): 525–562. doi:10.1177/0306312702032004002. ISSN 0306-3127. S2CID 144059198.
  317. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 305–308
  318. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 305–306
  319. ^ Young & Schilling 2019, pp. 154, 163–164
  320. ^ Cassidy 2005, pp. 281–284
  321. ^ Carson 2005, pp. 1–10
  322. ^ Bird & Sherwin 2005, pp. 3, 5, passim
  323. ^ Hewlett & Holl 1989, p. xxii
  324. ^ a b Bundy 1988, p. 316
  325. ^ Huhtala, Jussi (October 9, 2023). "Suomessa tehtiin Oppenheimerista kertova tv-elokuva jo vuonna 1967: Löytyy Areenasta". Episodi (in Finnish). Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  326. ^ "Oppenheimerin tapaus". Elonet (in Finnish). Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  327. ^ "Playwright Suggests Corrections to Oppenheimer Drama". The New York Times. November 14, 1964. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  328. ^ Barnes, Clive (June 7, 1968). "Theater: Drama of Oppenheimer Case". The New York Times. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  329. ^ "The character speaks out". Time. November 11, 1964. Archived from the original on March 8, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  330. ^ Seagrave, Sterling (November 9, 1964). "Play about him draws protests of Oppenheimer". The Washington Post. p. B8.
  331. ^ "The 2006 Pulitzer Prize Winners – Biography or Autobiography". The Pulitzer Prizes. Archived from the original on August 14, 2011. Retrieved March 5, 2011.
  332. ^ Canby, Vincent (2009). "The Day After Trinity: Oppenheimer & the Atomic Bomb (1980)". Movies & TV Dept. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 6, 2009. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  333. ^ "Peabody Award Winners" (PDF). University of Georgia. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 26, 2011. Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  334. ^ The Day After Trinity at IMDb Edit this at Wikidata Retrieved December 11, 2010.
  335. ^ Billington, Michael (January 24, 2015). "Oppenheimer five-star review – father of atomic bomb becomes tragic hero at RSC". The Guardian. Archived from the original on April 4, 2015. Retrieved May 1, 2015.
  336. ^ "Fat Man and Little Boy (1989)". Popmatters. May 3, 2004. Archived from the original on May 12, 2023. Retrieved August 1, 2022.
  337. ^ "Day One (1989 TV Movie)". Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on July 30, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
  338. ^ Kroll, Justin (October 8, 2021). "Cillian Murphy Confirmed to Star As J. Robert Oppenheimer In Christopher Nolan's Next Film At Universal, Film Will Bow in July 2023". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on October 8, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  339. ^ Lee, Benjamin (March 11, 2024). "Oppenheimer wins best picture Oscar as Emma Stone pulls surprise win". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
  340. ^ "J. Robert Oppenheimer Centennial at Berkeley". University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original on June 11, 2010. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
  341. ^ "Reappraising Oppenheimer – Centennial Studies and Reflections". Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original on January 25, 2012. Retrieved December 16, 2013.
  342. ^ "J. Robert Oppenheimer Papers" (PDF). Library of Congress. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 18, 2012. Retrieved March 23, 2011.
  343. ^ Quoted in Cassidy 2005, p. xvi
  344. ^ Cassidy 2005, p. 175
  345. ^ "Small-Body Database Browser 67085 Oppenheimer (2000 AG42)". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Archived from the original on January 30, 2012. Retrieved February 27, 2011.
  346. ^ Anderson & Whitaker 1982, p. 54
  347. ^ Hollinger 2005, p. 387
  348. ^ See Wortham 1886, p. 15 for a different translation.



  • Anderson, Leif E.; Whitaker, Ewen A. (1982). NASA Catalogue of Lunar Nomenclature (PDF). Springfield, Virginia: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
  • Bethe, Hans (1968b). The Road from Los Alamos. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 978-0-88318-707-4.
  • Bird, Kai; Sherwin, Martin J. (2005). American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-375-41202-8.
  • Bundy, McGeorge (1988). Danger and Survival: Choices About the Bomb in the First Fifty Years. New York: Random House. ISBN 978-0-394-52278-4.
  • Carson, Cathryn (2005). "§Introduction". In Carson, Cathryn; Hollinger, David A. (eds.). Reappraising Oppenheimer: Centennial Studies and Reflections. Berkeley, California: Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California. pp. 1–10. ISBN 978-0-9672617-3-7.
  • Cassidy, David C. (2005). J. Robert Oppenheimer and the American Century. New York: Pi Press. ISBN 978-0-13-147996-8.
  • Childs, Herbert (1968). An American Genius: The Life of Ernest Orlando Lawrence, Father of the Cyclotron. New York City: E. P. Dutton. ISBN 978-0-525-05443-6.
  • Conant, Jennet (2005). 109 East Palace: Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-5007-8.
  • Feldman, Burton (2000). The Nobel Prize: A History of Genius, Controversy, and Prestige. New York: Arcade Publishing. ISBN 978-1-55970-537-0.
  • Groves, Leslie (1962). Now it Can be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project. New York: Harper & Brothers. ISBN 978-0-306-70738-4.
  • Haynes, John Earl (2006). Early Cold War Spies: The Espionage Trials that Shaped American Politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-67407-2.
  • Haynes, John Earl; Klehr, Harvey; Vassiliev, Alexander (2009). Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12390-6.
  • Herken, Gregg (2002). Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller. New York: Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 978-0-8050-6588-6.
  • Hewlett, Richard G.; Anderson, Oscar E. (1962). The New World, 1939–1946. A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Vol. I. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 978-0-520-07186-5.
  • Hewlett, Richard G.; Duncan, Francis (1969). Atomic Shield, 1947–1952. A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Vol. II. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 978-0-520-07187-2.
  • Hewlett, Richard G.; Holl, Jack M. (1989). Atoms for Peace and War, 1953–1961: Eisenhower and the Atomic Energy Commission (PDF). A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06018-0. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 23, 2020. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  • Hoddeson, Lillian; Henriksen, Paul W.; Meade, Roger A.; Westfall, Catherine L. (1993). Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years, 1943–1945. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44132-2.
  • Hollinger, David A. (2005). "§Afterward". In Carson, Cathryn; Hollinger, David A. (eds.). Reappraising Oppenheimer: Centennial Studies and Reflections. Berkeley, California: Office for History of Science and Technology, Univ. of California. pp. 385–390. ISBN 978-0-9672617-3-7.
  • Hufbauer, Karl (2005). "J. Robert Oppenheimer's Path to Black Holes". In Carson, Cathryn; Hollinger, David A. (eds.). Reappraising Oppenheimer: Centennial Studies and Reflections. Berkeley, California: Office for History of Science and Technology, Univ. of California. pp. 31–47. ISBN 978-0-9672617-3-7.
  • Hunner, John (2012). J. Robert Oppenheimer, the Cold War, and the Atomic West. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 978-0-8061-6308-6.
  • Jones, Vincent (1985). Manhattan: The Army and the Atomic Bomb. Washington, D.C.: United States Army Center of Military History.
  • Jungk, Robert (1958). Brighter than a Thousand Suns: A Personal History of the Atomic Scientists. New York: Harcourt Brace. ISBN 978-0-15-614150-5.
  • Kelly, Cynthia C. (2006). Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project: Insights into J. Robert Oppenheimer, "Father of the Atomic Bomb". Hackensack, New Jersey: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-256-418-4.
  • McMillan, Priscilla Johnson (2005). The Ruin of J. Robert Oppenheimer and the Birth of the Modern Arms Race. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-03422-2.
  • Monk, Ray (2012). Robert Oppenheimer: A Life Inside the Center. New York; Toronto: Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-50407-2.
  • Nichols, Kenneth (1987). The Road to Trinity: A Personal Account of How America's Nuclear Policies Were Made. New York: William Morrow and Company. ISBN 978-0688069100.
  • Norris, Robert S. (2002). Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie R. Groves, the Manhattan Project's Indispensable Man. South Royalton, Vermont: Steerforth Press. ISBN 1-58642-039-9.
  • Pais, Abraham (2006). J. Robert Oppenheimer: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516673-6.
  • Polenberg, Richard (2002). In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer: The Security Clearance Hearing. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University. ISBN 978-0-8014-3783-0.
  • Polenberg, Richard (2005). "The Fortunate Fox". In Carson, Cathryn; Hollinger, David A. (eds.). Reappraising Oppenheimer: Centennial Studies and Reflections. Berkeley, California: Office for History of Science and Technology, Univ. of California. pp. 267–272. ISBN 978-0-9672617-3-7.
  • Rhodes, Richard (1986). The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-671-44133-3.
  • Rhodes, Richard (1995). Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-82414-7.
  • Roy, Kaustuv (2018). Rethinking Curriculum in Times of Shifting Educational Context. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61106-8. ISBN 978-3-319-61105-1.
  • Schweber, Silvan S. (2008). Einstein and Oppenheimer: the Meaning of Genius. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-02828-9.
  • Smith, Alice Kimball; Weiner, Charles (1980). Robert Oppenheimer: Letters and Recollections. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-2620-7.
  • Spangenburg, Ray; Moser, Diane (2004). Science Frontiers, 1946 to the Present. New York: Facts On File. ISBN 978-0-816-06880-7.
  • Stern, Philip M. (1969). The Oppenheimer Case: Security on Trial. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Streshinsky, Shirley; Klaus, Patricia (2013). An Atomic Love Story: The Extraordinary Women in Robert Oppenheimer's Life. New York: Turner Publishing. ISBN 978-1-61858-019-1.
  • Strout, Cushing (1963). Conscience, Science and Security: The Case of Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Szasz, Ferenc M. (1984). The Day the Sun Rose Twice. Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press. ISBN 978-0-8263-0767-5.
  • United States Atomic Energy Commission (1954). In the Matter of Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.
  • Wolverton, Mark (2008). A Life in Twilight: The Final Years of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-37440-2.
  • Wortham, Biscoe Hale (1886). The Śatakas of Bhartr̥ihari. Trübner's Oriental series. London: Trübner.
  • Young, Ken; Schilling, Warner R. (2019). Super Bomb: Organizational Conflict and the Development of the Hydrogen Bomb. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-1-5017-4516-4.


  • Boyce, Niall (February 14, 2015). "Man of steel". The Lancet. 385 (9968): 577–662. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60221-5. S2CID 54252502. Archived from the original on March 27, 2023. Retrieved July 15, 2023.
  • Hijiya, James A. (June 2000). "The Gita of Robert Oppenheimer" (PDF). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 144 (2). ISSN 0003-049X. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 26, 2013. Retrieved December 23, 2013.
  • Rhodes, Richard (October 1977). "'I Am Become Death ... ': The Agony of J. Robert Oppenheimer". American Heritage. Archived from the original on June 12, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  • Sanders, Jane A. (1979). "The University of Washington and the Controversy over J. Robert Oppenheimer". The Pacific Northwest Quarterly. 70 (1): 8–19. ISSN 0030-8803. JSTOR 40489791.
  • Schweber, Silvan S. (2006). "Einstein and Oppenheimer: Interactions and Intersections". Science in Context. 19 (4). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press: 513–559. doi:10.1017/S0269889706001050. S2CID 145807656.
  • Scott, Terry; Besmann, Theodore M.; Goldberg, Stanley; Hawkins, David (1994). "Letters". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 50 (5): 3–60. Bibcode:1994BuAtS..50e...3S. doi:10.1080/00963402.1994.11456544. ISSN 0096-3402.
  • Hart, Curtis W. (2008). "J. Robert Oppenheimer: A Faith Development Portrait". Journal of Religion and Health. 47 (1): 118–128. doi:10.1007/s10943-007-9136-z. PMID 19105006. S2CID 21379766.

Further reading

Library resources about
J. Robert Oppenheimer
  • Resources in your library
  • Resources in other libraries



  • Chevalier, Haakon (1965). Oppenheimer: The Story of a Friendship. New York: Braziller. OCLC 1233721.
  • Conant, Jennet (2006). 109 East Palace: Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-5007-8. OCLC 57475908.
  • Davis, Nuel Pharr (1986). Lawrence and Oppenheimer. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-306-80280-5. OCLC 13560672.
  • Kunetka, James (2015). The General and the Genius: Groves and Oppenheimer — the Unlikely Partnership That Built the Atom Bomb. Washington, D.C.: Regnery History. ISBN 978-1-62157-338-8. OCLC 891618851.
  • York, Herbert F. (1976). The Advisors: Oppenheimer, Teller, and the Superbomb. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-1714-4. OCLC 20721862.

External links

Listen to this article (43 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 18 April 2005 (2005-04-18), and does not reflect subsequent edits.
(Audio help · More spoken articles)
Government offices
Preceded by
New office
Director of the Los Alamos Laboratory
Succeeded by
  • v
  • t
  • e
SitesAdministratorsScientistsOperationsWeaponsRelated topics
  • v
  • t
  • e
  • v
  • t
  • e
Military installations
See also
J. Robert Oppenheimer at Wikipedia's sister projects:
  • Media from Commons
  • Quotations from Wikiquote
  • Data from Wikidata
Authority control databases Edit this at Wikidata
  • FAST
  • ISNI
  • VIAF
  • WorldCat
  • Norway
  • Spain
  • France
  • BnF data
  • Catalonia
  • Germany
  • Italy
  • Israel
  • Belgium
  • United States
  • Sweden
  • Latvia
  • Japan
  • Czech Republic
  • Australia
  • Greece
  • Korea
  • Croatia
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
    • 2
  • Portugal
  • CiNii
  • MathSciNet
  • Mathematics Genealogy Project
  • Scopus
  • zbMATH
  • MusicBrainz
  • Deutsche Biographie
  • Trove
  • NARA
  • SNAC
  • IdRef